Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-25 Thread Ronan Waide
On August 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: As far as I know, pure unpatched RMAIL (in GNU Emacs) never had the ability to display these in a readable form. People have patched it in their personal versions to do a readable display. Ok, well, the reworking I'm doing will take whatever is

Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-18 Thread Ronan Waide
On August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Evil Boris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have seen the msg from Adrian Lanz regarding RFC2047-encoded From: fields, a few months back. I have been using the following patch to bbdb.el for a couple of years, with no visible ill effects. Ulike

Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-18 Thread Evil Boris
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm looking at a cleaner way around this, but I'm a little puzzled: does rmail simply not decode these headers when it's displaying them? I've put a test one into an RMAIL buffer here and it's displaying it 'raw'. As far as I know, pure unpatched RMAIL

Re: rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-13 Thread Adrian Aichner
Evil Boris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have seen the msg from Adrian Lanz regarding RFC2047-encoded From: fields, a few months back. I have been using the following patch to bbdb.el for a couple of years, with no visible ill effects. Ulike Adrian's patch, mine decodes the From fields before

rfc2047 name decoding patch

2005-08-11 Thread Evil Boris
I have seen the msg from Adrian Lanz regarding RFC2047-encoded From: fields, a few months back. I have been using the following patch to bbdb.el for a couple of years, with no visible ill effects. Ulike Adrian's patch, mine decodes the From fields before looking them up and/or storing them into