On , February 11 2001 21:45:22, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
[...]
> No. Test for each individual feature and then DTRT if the feature is
> there. For example, if BBDB were to display images, testing for
> XEmacs vs Emacs is the wrong thing to do -- Emacs 21 can display
> images, too.
That right, blam
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Robert Fenk wrote:
> You are right, actually speaking there is quite some
> GNU/XEmacs compatibility code scatters across various files,
> it would be a good idea to put it into one file and "require"
> that file for GNU Emacs.
No. Test for each individual feature and then D
On Monday, February 5 2001 23:51:24, Alex Schroeder wrote:
> Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The latest CVS seems to have an XEmacsism... The function
> > replace-in-string is not in Emacs 20.7.
>
> Well, there is compatibility code in bbdb-snarf, so maybe this should
> be move
On Sunday, February 4 2001 00:14:17, Alex Schroeder wrote:
> The latest CVS seems to have an XEmacsism... The function
> replace-in-string is not in Emacs 20.7.
Fixed in the current CVS.
Cheers Robert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.ne
Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The latest CVS seems to have an XEmacsism... The function
> replace-in-string is not in Emacs 20.7.
Well, there is compatibility code in bbdb-snarf, so maybe this should
be moved from bbdb-snarf.el to bbdb.el (where the offending
replace-in-string re
The latest CVS seems to have an XEmacsism... The function
replace-in-string is not in Emacs 20.7.
Alex.
--
http://www.geocities.com/kensanata/emacs.html
"gnu.emacs.help is for GNU Emacs, comp.emacs.xemacs is for XEmacs."
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
