On 02 Mar 2012, at 12:38 , Clark Goble wrote:
> But I think we should respect Rich's comments and not discuss this here.
> There probably are NDA issues involved and I can't recall what's what.
Oh, I thought it was the somewhat off-color track the discussion started down
that Rich didn’t want
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:42 AM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
> App Sandboxing is a moving target, and nobody (including Apple, I suspect)
> knows all the answers yet.
While I've been pretty critical of sandboxing the past few months I think that
Apple (and Ivan Krstić in particular) really do want to get
On 1-Mar-2012, at 09:15, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
>
>> App Sandboxing is
>
> Like a chroot'd environment but per app?
Based on the comments about the development of Bookle a chroot environment
sounds about right. Bookle has to copy any e
On Mar 1, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
> I suggest:
>
> http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/07/mac-os-x-10-7.ars/9
>
> for the high-level overview.
Wow. The complexity just never ends. Thanks for sending.
Ted
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
"B
On 2012-03-01 17:15, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Steve Kalkwarf
wrote:
App Sandboxing is
Like a chroot'd environment but per app?
I really am curious and not just being silly.
Yes/No. Public info:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/07/mac-os-x-10-7.ars
>> App Sandboxing is
>
> Like a chroot'd environment but per app?
>
> I really am curious and not just being silly.
Yes, with additional restrictions.
I suggest:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/07/mac-os-x-10-7.ars/9
for the high-level overview.
--
You received this message becau
On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
> App Sandboxing is
Like a chroot'd environment but per app?
I really am curious and not just being silly.
Ted
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this gr
>> I'm curious how the sandboxing requirements are going to be affecting future
>> versions of BBEdit on the Mac App Store.
>> Just idle curiosity, I own the regular version.
>
> Steve, your answer gave me a good laugh.. and by Rich's reply I am thinking
> that we are supposed to take this off l
I'm curious how the sandboxing requirements are going to be affecting
future versions of BBEdit on the Mac App Store.
>
> Just idle curiosity, I own the regular version.
>
Steve, your answer gave me a good laugh.. and by Rich's reply I am thinking
that we are supposed to take this off list.. but
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012, G. T. Stresen-Reuter
wrote:
> So, looks like I need to do some reading as I have no idea what the
> sandboxing requirement is but judging by Steve's response, well,
> Santorum might be a synonym?
>
> Please enlighten me (but be gentle...)
If you do so, off-list,
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
>> I'm curious how the sandboxing requirements are going to be affecting future
>> versions of BBEdit on the Mac App Store.
>>
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Passion-Natural-Water-Based-Lubricant-Gallon/dp/B005MR3IVO
>
So, looks like I need to do
> I'm curious how the sandboxing requirements are going to be affecting future
> versions of BBEdit on the Mac App Store.
>
http://www.amazon.com/Passion-Natural-Water-Based-Lubricant-Gallon/dp/B005MR3IVO
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
"BBEdit Talk" discussion
I'm curious how the sandboxing requirements are going to be affecting future
versions of BBEdit on the Mac App Store.
Just idle curiosity, I own the regular version.
--
There is a tragic flaw in our precious Constitution, and I don t know
what can be done to fix it. This is it: Only nut cases w
13 matches
Mail list logo
