Does bcm4311 support connect Ap with "shared key" authorized mode?

2007-03-12 Thread Yanbo Li
Hi guys: I am using bcm4311 connect with a Ap(Dlink624+) under "shared key" authorized mode. But the dmesg show "eth1: authentication with AP 00:17:89:55:ed:df timed out". When I search the mails and found Johannes Berg had said that "the shared key is not support at Jan 2006". I want to know is i

Re: bcm43xx_mac80211 not works on Compaq nx6110

2007-03-12 Thread Tomas Martisius
> Good. This looks like success to me. > Looks like sucess, but I am not very happy using bcm43xx softmac driver. That's why I'm testing bcm43xx-mac80211. For example why in "rate auto" speed does not goes up than 11M? :~# iwconfig wlan0 rate auto :~# iwconfig wlan0 wlan0 IEEE 802.11b/g ESSID:

what's "but no queue item exists"?

2007-03-12 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi, my log is full with this messages: Can someone explain me, what the mean? SoftMAC: Already associating or associated to 00:14:1b:60:6a:40 SoftMAC: Scanning finished: scanned 14 channels starting with channel 1 SoftMAC: generic IE set to dd160050f2010150f2020150f2020150f201 SoftMAC

[RFC] bcm43xx: Replace some magic numbers

2007-03-12 Thread Larry Finger
In code manipulating the TM State Low register of 802.11 cores, two different magic numbers are used to reference the 'G Mode Enable' bit. One of these, 0x2000, is clear, but the other, (0x800 << 18), is not. This patch replaces both types with a defined constant. In addition, two bits in the T

Re: [RFT] [PATCH] bcm43xx: ACI fixes

2007-03-12 Thread Larry Finger
Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2007 21:28, Larry Finger wrote: >> Stefano Brivio wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:51:19 -0500 >>> >>> Well, wait. I'd want to see some performance improvements before the patch >>> is applied. That's why I didn't send it to John and put RFT in the >>> su

Re: [RFT] [PATCH] bcm43xx: ACI fixes

2007-03-12 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 12 March 2007 21:28, Larry Finger wrote: > Stefano Brivio wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:51:19 -0500 > > > > Well, wait. I'd want to see some performance improvements before the patch > > is applied. That's why I didn't send it to John and put RFT in the > > subject. Are there any? >

Re: [RFT] [PATCH] bcm43xx: ACI fixes

2007-03-12 Thread Larry Finger
Stefano Brivio wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:51:19 -0500 > > Well, wait. I'd want to see some performance improvements before the patch > is applied. That's why I didn't send it to John and put RFT in the > subject. Are there any? No, I don't see any significant difference in RX or TX throughpu

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread Larry Finger
Joe, Joseph Jezak wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 11:30 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: >>> There was an error in the B5PHY init specifications. >> This patch doesn't fix the machine check in bcm43xx_phy_initb5 which >> Pavel Roskin and I reported a couple of weeks ago. To get

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread Larry Finger
John W. Linville wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:42:18PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: >> David Woodhouse wrote: >>> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:53 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: FWIW, by inspection it looks like the mac80211-based driver is (trying?) to implement this change. Dav

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:16:34PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:53 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > > FWIW, by inspection it looks like the mac80211-based driver is > > (trying?) to implement this change. > > > > David, have you tried the mac80211 version? Does it

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:42:18PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:53 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > >> FWIW, by inspection it looks like the mac80211-based driver is > >> (trying?) to implement this change. > >> > >> David, have you tried the mac8

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread Larry Finger
David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:53 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> FWIW, by inspection it looks like the mac80211-based driver is >> (trying?) to implement this change. >> >> David, have you tried the mac80211 version? Does it still have the >> same crash? > > Should the one i

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:53 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > FWIW, by inspection it looks like the mac80211-based driver is > (trying?) to implement this change. > > David, have you tried the mac80211 version? Does it still have the > same crash? Should the one in 2.6.20-1.2982.fc7 be OK? I c

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:23:30AM -0400, Joseph Jezak wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 11:30 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > >> There was an error in the B5PHY init specifications. > > > > This patch doesn't fix the machine check in bcm43xx_phy_initb5 which > > Pavel Roskin

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix typo in B5PHY init specifications

2007-03-12 Thread Joseph Jezak
David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 11:30 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: >> There was an error in the B5PHY init specifications. > > This patch doesn't fix the machine check in bcm43xx_phy_initb5 which > Pavel Roskin and I reported a couple of weeks ago. To get rid of that > crash, I still