[PATCH] b43: Fix ofdmtab write regression

2007-12-09 Thread Michael Buesch
commit f04b3787bbce4567e28069a9ec97dcd804626ac7 introduced a regression for the ofdmtable writing. It incorrectly removed the writing of the high 16bits for a 32bit table write and initialized the direction identifier too late. This patch does also some cleanups to make the code much more readabl

Re: SPROM rev 4

2007-12-09 Thread Michael Gerdau
> It would be great if you have some time to further continue development > on the driver. We always need new developers who know what they do. :) Not sure I do qualify w/r to the "who know what they do" part but I'm willing to try :) Best, Michael -- Michael Gerdau email: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: b43 continues to have issue with APs at times

2007-12-09 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 09 December 2007 12:37:27 John H. wrote: > i dont know what other ones i would have used. bcm43xx never worked > right, really, and had bandwidth limitations. > > Right now I am downloading over a wireless lan and getting 1mb/s. > Why? That just makes no sense. Because it's broken?

Re: SPROM rev 4

2007-12-09 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 09 December 2007 12:31:40 Michael Gerdau wrote: > > Can you send me the code you have? I am going to buy various N devices. > > So I want to avoid duplicating work. > > Yes, sure. > I'll do a bit of cleaning up and mail it to you (either tonight or > tomorrow). > > I also have a few are

Re: SPROM rev 4

2007-12-09 Thread Michael Gerdau
> Can you send me the code you have? I am going to buy various N devices. > So I want to avoid duplicating work. Yes, sure. I'll do a bit of cleaning up and mail it to you (either tonight or tomorrow). I also have a few areas where I feel I'm stuck (this being my very first kernel/driver project

Re: b43 continues to have issue with APs at times

2007-12-09 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 09 December 2007 09:01:26 John H. wrote: > no, i stopped using ndiswrapper a while back because I wanted to use > b43, but I did not have this issue then. But ndiswrapper doesn't use mac80211, right? Do you see this issue with other _mac80211_ drivers? > On Dec 8, 2007 2:35 PM, Michael