On Monday 11 January 2010 03:38:53 Larry Finger wrote:
> Yes, my fault. The specs are now corrected so that these statements are
>
> ((s8)((s[1] >> 8) & 0x3F) << 2) >> 2
>
> I think that is right.
No it is not.
You need to do this:
(s8)(((s[1] >> 8) & 0x3F) << 2) >> 2
Alternatively add another
2010/1/10 Michael Buesch :
> On Sunday 10 January 2010 23:13:34 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> + s32 results_min[4];
>> + u8 vcm_final[4];
>> + s32 results[4][4];
>> + s32 miniq[4][2];
>> + memset(results_min, 0, sizeof(s32) * 4);
>> + memset(vcm_final, 0, sizeof(u8) * 4);
>> +
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 96 ++
1 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index a44fca1..214cf54 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wi
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/N/RSSICal */
static void b43_nphy_rev2_rssi_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev, u8 type)
{
- //TODO
+ int i, j;
+ u8 state[4];
+ u8 code, val;
+ u16 class, override;
+ u8 regs_save_radio[2];
+
On Monday 11 January 2010 22:13:31 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2010/1/10 Michael Buesch :
> > On Sunday 10 January 2010 23:13:34 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> + s32 results_min[4];
> >> + u8 vcm_final[4];
> >> + s32 results[4][4];
> >> + s32 miniq[4][2];
> >> + memset(results_min, 0, siz
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 23:13 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> No I don't think so.
> It's C standard that uninitialized elements on automatic variables are
> initialized
> to zero, _if_ at least one element is initialized to something.
> So if you init one element to 0, all others will be 0, too.
AF
On Monday 11 January 2010 23:19:52 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 23:13 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> > No I don't think so.
> > It's C standard that uninitialized elements on automatic variables are
> > initialized
> > to zero, _if_ at least one element is initialized to somethin
W dniu 11 stycznia 2010 23:13 użytkownik Michael Buesch
napisał:
> On Monday 11 January 2010 22:13:31 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> 2010/1/10 Michael Buesch :
>> > On Sunday 10 January 2010 23:13:34 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> >> + s32 results_min[4];
>> >> + u8 vcm_final[4];
>> >> + s32 result
On Monday 11 January 2010 23:27:18 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Whoops, I should have explained what I mean. I am not sure what CFLAGS
> "make" picks for compiled but I get:
>
> CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.o
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c: In function ‘b43_nphy_rev2_rssi_cal’:
> drivers
W dniu 11 stycznia 2010 23:42 użytkownik Michael Buesch
napisał:
> On Monday 11 January 2010 23:27:18 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Whoops, I should have explained what I mean. I am not sure what CFLAGS
>> "make" picks for compiled but I get:
>>
>> CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.o
>> drivers/
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/N/RSSICal */
static void b43_nphy_rev2_rssi_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev, u8 type)
{
- //TODO
+ int i, j;
+ u8 state[4];
+ u8 code, val;
+ u16 class, override;
+ u8 regs_save_radio[2];
+
11 matches
Mail list logo
