This patch adds some hooks for firmware debugging.
Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
John, this is for 2.6.27
Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
===
--- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wir
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch adds some hooks for firmware debugging.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> John, this is for 2.6.27
>
>
> Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
>
On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:21:22 Stefanik Gábor wrote:
> Hmm... what's this? Are we planning something along the lines of
> prism54's FreeMAC?
http://bu3sch.de/gitweb?p=b43-ucode.git;a=summary
Doesn't work, yet. So you don't need to try. ;)
--
Greetings Michael.
2008/5/17, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:21:22 Stefanik Gábor wrote:
> > Hmm... what's this? Are we planning something along the lines of
> > prism54's FreeMAC?
>
>
> http://bu3sch.de/gitweb?p=b43-ucode.git;a=summary
>
> Doesn't work, yet. So you don't need to
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:21:22 Stefanik Gábor wrote:
>> Hmm... what's this? Are we planning something along the lines of
>> prism54's FreeMAC?
>
> http://bu3sch.de/gitweb?p=b43-ucode.git;a=summary
>
> Doesn't work, yet.
On Sunday 18 May 2008 00:27:49 Stefanik Gábor wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 May 2008 23:21:22 Stefanik Gábor wrote:
> >> Hmm... what's this? Are we planning something along the lines of
> >> prism54's FreeMAC?
> >
> > http://
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 May 2008 00:27:49 Stefanik Gábor wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm, are we calling this "Broadcom BCM43xx Microcode" instead of
>> "Broadcom AirForce
Stefanik Gábor wrote:
>
> Hmm, are we calling this "Broadcom BCM43xx Microcode" instead of
> "Broadcom AirForce One Microcode" for licensing/trademark reasons? The
> official name of these cards is AirForce One.
>
Some of these cards may be called AirForce One; however, I have 7 different
cards
Stefanik Gábor wrote:
>
> Another question: is this legal in the US? AFAIK this might conflict
> with FCC regulations. (Not sure about EU.)
>
Although I don't claim to be a lawyer, I found this information from
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/fcc-sdr-whitepaper.html,
which is a
On Sat, 17 May 2008 18:33:55 -0500
Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of these cards may be called AirForce One; however, I have 7 different
> cards of varying form factor, and none of them have that name!
FWIW, 'lspci | grep 4318':
06:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation B
10 matches
Mail list logo