I'm going to move all v4 workarounds needed for the A and G PHY setup into a
separate file (draft inlined here), as it'll easily get to ~1000 lines, and
I wouldn't really want to make a mess out of _phy.c. These workarounds
are strictly needed for A PHY support (which I'm currently working on)
and
On Monday 09 April 2007 04:07, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> I'm going to move all v4 workarounds needed for the A and G PHY setup into a
> separate file (draft inlined here), as it'll easily get to ~1000 lines, and
> I wouldn't really want to make a mess out of _phy.c. These workarounds
> are strictly n
Thanks for your comments. But it's a draft. It wasn't supposed to build or
to be correct. I just asked to comment about the whole thing. Thanks.
--
Ciao
Stefano
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 12:41:32 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Put () around the bitwise &. (I think the compiler even complains about
> this).
Not needed, anyway. gcc doesn't complain and & has precedence over &&.
--
Ciao
Stefano
___
B
