On Monday 05 November 2007 17:03:47 Larry Finger wrote:
> u8 path_data0[SPROM_PATH_DATA_SIZE];
> u8 path_data1 ...
>
> where SPROM_PATH_DATA_SIZE = 0x26. Once we see how the data are used, it may
> make more sense to have
> these data be u16,
> or even a union so that we can have it
Am Samstag, 3. November 2007 schrieb Larry Finger:
> The BCM4328 has a revision 4 SPROM. The necessary changes to handle the
> layout and different size of this revision are implemented. The size of
> the SPROM is now stored in the ssb_bus struct and used from that location
> whenever possible. For
Michael Buesch wrote:
> Larry, I did not forget your patch.
> But I need to think a little bit more about this.
I knew that this one would take some time.
> The union above is not really what I'd like to have here. In fact,
> I think to get the v4 sprom implemented the sprom struct has to be
> re
On Saturday 03 November 2007 16:19:46 Larry Finger wrote:
> The BCM4328 has a revision 4 SPROM. The necessary changes to handle the
> layout and different size of this revision are implemented. The size of
> the SPROM is now stored in the ssb_bus struct and used from that location
> whenever possib
The BCM4328 has a revision 4 SPROM. The necessary changes to handle the
layout and different size of this revision are implemented. The size of
the SPROM is now stored in the ssb_bus struct and used from that location
whenever possible. For those routines that need the size, but do not have
access
