> I think most, if not all, the 4311 and 4312's are helped. I will be
> submitting a set of
> patches this afternoon that help most cards.
I just wanted to express my thanks for all your work on this driver,
and everyone else who's contributed to it. Since this patch has fixed
the speed issues,
John W. Linville wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 05:41:06PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Miles Lane wrote:
>>> I am testing this patch applied to the wireless-net git tree.
>>> The card is a Linksys WPC54G. The card is still getting very
>>> weak signal strength and the connection seems unrespon
[Freitag, 9. Februar 2007 18:00] schrieb Larry Finger (wrote):
> Jochen Puchalla wrote:
> > Hi Larry,
> >
> > I tried both versions with the combined patch on 2.6.20-rc7, still only
> > 100kB/s. Could this be related to the fact that I have a b-type router
> > and not a g-type?
>
> It shouldn't. I
> > I have one more test to try... I am strangely never able to associate
> > with the wifi router in my girlfriend's apartment, however it is a
> > crappy old D-Link B-series router. I'll try it next time I get a
> > chance. (I've long suspected the reason is that she lives in an
> > apartment b
Miles Lane wrote:
> I am testing this patch applied to the wireless-net git tree.
> The card is a Linksys WPC54G. The card is still getting very
> weak signal strength and the connection seems unresponsive
> most of the time.
As the subject says, the patch was for 4311 and 4312 cards. The 4318's
Jochen Puchalla wrote:
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> I tried both versions with the combined patch on 2.6.20-rc7, still only
> 100kB/s. Could this be related to the fact that I have a b-type router
> and not a g-type?
It shouldn't. I just ran tests here with different settings on my AP. With a
B-only setti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Finger wrote:
> Jochen Puchalla wrote:
>> this sounds wonderful! However, I applied this patch and
>> radio_enable_2.6.20 to my 2.6.20-rc7 on an HP nx6325 (I know you have
>> one as well), but still I only get 100kB/s at 1M 2M 5.5M and 11M. Do I
On Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:11, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apologies for being so slow about applying and testing this patch.
> Now that I had some time, I tried to be quite methodical about it. I
> hadn't used iperf before, so I'm happy to have heard about this nice
> tool.
>
> He
Hello,
Apologies for being so slow about applying and testing this patch.
Now that I had some time, I tried to be quite methodical about it. I
hadn't used iperf before, so I'm happy to have heard about this nice
tool.
Here are my results, 4311, HD dv2020 laptop:
WITHOUT the patch in this thread
On Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:17, Larry Finger wrote:
> Jochen Puchalla wrote:
> > this sounds wonderful! However, I applied this patch and
> > radio_enable_2.6.20 to my 2.6.20-rc7 on an HP nx6325 (I know you have
> > one as well), but still I only get 100kB/s at 1M 2M 5.5M and 11M. Do I
> > need
Jochen Puchalla wrote:
> this sounds wonderful! However, I applied this patch and
> radio_enable_2.6.20 to my 2.6.20-rc7 on an HP nx6325 (I know you have
> one as well), but still I only get 100kB/s at 1M 2M 5.5M and 11M. Do I
> need the combined-patch for 2.6.20? I only have 1GB RAM and don't do
>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 February 2007 07:34, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:02 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>> The patch below will only affect cards with PHY revision 8, which I think
>>> are only BCM4311 and
>>> BCM4312. At least those are the only ones in the
On Wednesday, 7 February 2007 07:34, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:02 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> > The patch below will only affect cards with PHY revision 8, which I think
> > are only BCM4311 and
> > BCM4312. At least those are the only ones in the database.
>
> BCM4312, old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Finger wrote:
> The patch I sent out earlier was wrong; however, it provided a clue as to
> what was wrong in the
> specs and in the code. As it turned out, the mistake I made earlier only
> affected 4 places in the
> code and it was easy to te
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:02 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> The patch below will only affect cards with PHY revision 8, which I think are
> only BCM4311 and
> BCM4312. At least those are the only ones in the database.
BCM4312, old patch: 1.7M/s
no patch: 26k/s
no patch, rate 1: 100k/s
new patch: 1.7
The patch I sent out earlier was wrong; however, it provided a clue as to what
was wrong in the
specs and in the code. As it turned out, the mistake I made earlier only
affected 4 places in the
code and it was easy to test them in turn. According to Murphy's law, the wrong
one was the last one
t
16 matches
Mail list logo
