Does this mean the DMA engines are implemented in silicon?
Yeah, it's not implemented in the firmware so it must be in silicon.
If so, there may be an error in the chip
design. AFAIK, all Windows DMA is done to really low-order memory, and such a
defect would not show
there. I do not
Johannes Berg wrote:
It appears that I have found either a hardware error with my copy of that
card, or there is an error
in the ucode13 firmware.
FWIW, the firmware is hardly involved in DMA so that's extremely
unlikely.
Does this mean the DMA engines are implemented in silicon? If so,
Is anyone running my 4311 rev 02 patches? If so, I need some help.
It appears that I have found either a hardware error with my copy of that card,
or there is an error
in the ucode13 firmware. Between 2.6.24-rc2 and -rc3, code that resulted in the
Descriptor Address
Rings having low addresses
Sorry I meant to send this to the list.
On Nov 10, 2007 6:12 PM, evan foss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if this is correct as I still don't have the b43 driver
working but here is my boxes data.
Based on your problem description...
there isn't one.
Based on your uname -a ...
there isn't one.
Based on your dmesg...
there isn't one.
This is like a locked room mystery, right, you want us to solve the
problem without the problem being
a. mentioned
b. described
c. error messages
