Re: lurking...security

2003-01-22 Thread James Hedley
AIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:07 PM Subject: Re: lurking...security > > - Original Message - > From: Liz Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:13 AM > Subjec

Re: lurking...security

2003-01-20 Thread Allan Balliett
Liz said: If this link went underground we would be stifling the link that 2000+ / wk tap into. Research in this area is indicating that the minority (us) is now growing at a rapid rate, should we not nurture and feed rather than be silenced? You know, one thing that is evident to most anyone

Re: lurking...security

2003-01-20 Thread Christiane . Jaeger
Charles wrote: "The only people who would be affected are the busybody cruisers that are there either by accident or to cause mischief." How do you stop pepole who want to cause mischief from obtaining a password? What will be the criteria for being eligible for obtaining the password? Christia

Re: lurking...security

2003-01-20 Thread Roger Pye
I endorse Liz's post in its entirety. The reason for this about-face is very simple. I was so frightened last Saturday you would hardly believe it, and that was without facing the horror experienced by people who live in (and in some cases behind) the 'bushland' suburbs. It has been very diffic

Re: lurking...security

2003-01-20 Thread Lloyd Charles
- Original Message - From: Liz Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:13 AM Subject: lurking...security > Hi Liz, James, Jane et al. I think we've gotten many miles away from

lurking...security

2003-01-20 Thread Liz Davis
Hi all Understanding whole-heartedly what the Americans face, I'm in agreeance with Frank, James, Barbara and Jane. When reading the posts on this topic, duality is what keeps springing up. This to me emphasis the times we are in and how the 2 sides are needing to be brought together. Unsure if