[beagleboard] Re: L298 and Interfacing w/ the BBB/Trying!

Hello Once More, I am reverting back to 4.4.x. I tried 4.9.x and 4.14.x but to no avail. I will keep plugging at it. Seth On Wednesday, April 18, 2018 at 6:20:20 PM UTC-5, Mala Dies wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a L298 Motor Driver. I was wondering a couple of things. > > First: > > >- Do I

[beagleboard] Re: L298 and Interfacing w/ the BBB/Trying!

Hello, I thought it would be as easy as Uno, Dos, Tres. I was incorrect w/ this option of one, two, three. If you have time and if you are using the Adafruit_BBIO.PWM as PWM library to interface w/ this specific module, let a brother know. Seth P.S. I tried a couple of different software

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Car Hacking with a PocketBeagle (CAN, SWCAN, LIN/ISO9141/K-Line, J1850 and more)

It maybe of benefit to see a LIN implementation like this. Here is a paper: https://rtime.felk.cvut.cz/can/sllin-rtlws14-paper.pdf and here is some git code: https://github.com/trainman419/linux-lin/tree/master/sllin Disclaimer, I haven't used this module. Craig On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:53

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Car Hacking with a PocketBeagle (CAN, SWCAN, LIN/ISO9141/K-Line, J1850 and more)

Option 2 is where I was thinking. Additional devices can be done as a LIN, VPW, PWM devices. I haven't looked at the code base yet but will do so when I get the hardware to be able to do this. I have a pocketbeagle and a beagle bone black (for something else) on order now. When Macchina gets

[beagleboard] Re: [BBB] Power light on but no USR light activity

If you go to http://beagleboard.org/latest-images And download the appropriate image for your board, then install it on a microSD card using Etcher, without any changes. Then boot the BBB without removing the card, does the BBB run as expected? In other words, will the BBB run from the image on

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Car Hacking with a PocketBeagle (CAN, SWCAN, LIN/ISO9141/K-Line, J1850 and more)

I do think sockets will be the way to go for pretty much all of the interfaces. CAN and single wire CAN are obvious candidates for going with a native socketcan interface. Some of the other protocols might be a bit of a stretch. But, there exists two possibilities. 1. We can create another socket

Re: [beagleboard] cloud9 in responding on 2018-04-22 buster image

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Mark A. Yoder wrote: >> I've just downloaded >>

Re: [beagleboard] cloud9 in responding on 2018-04-22 buster image

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Mark A. Yoder wrote: > I've just downloaded > https://rcn-ee.com/rootfs/bb.org/testing/2018-04-22/buster-iot/bone-debian-buster-iot-armhf-2018-04-22-4gb.img.xz > and booted it up. > > Everything seems to be running fine, but cloud9 isn't

[beagleboard] cloud9 in responding on 2018-04-22 buster image

I've just downloaded https://rcn-ee.com/rootfs/bb.org/testing/2018-04-22/buster-iot/bone-debian-buster-iot-armhf-2018-04-22-4gb.img.xz and booted it up. Everything seems to be running fine, but cloud9 isn't responding on port 3000. In fact, I'm not getting a response on port 80 either.

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Car Hacking with a PocketBeagle (CAN, SWCAN, LIN/ISO9141/K-Line, J1850 and more)

I have emailed Earl and Josh about getting one of the Adapter boards when they are available. Just today I ordered a PocketBeagle to try and get up and running. I have a couple M2's right now and will try to get a new interface board so I am not sharing across the different devices. Since I will

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Car Hacking with a PocketBeagle (CAN, SWCAN, LIN/ISO9141/K-Line, J1850 and more)

> On Apr 22, 2018, at 6:37 PM, Drew Fustini wrote: > > Good to hear your interest. I recently saw the PocketBeagle adapter for > Macchina in the Car Hacking Village at CypherCon. I was talking to Will and > Earl at Macchina (cc'd) about future possibilities. > > My

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Device Tree compilation failure for Beaglebone black.

Yeah, I could able to compile. Regards, Madhu On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Kakarla Srinivas wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 5:24:29 AM UTC-5, Madhu K wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I am trying to compile the device tree.But I am getting below error

[beagleboard] Re: Device Tree compilation failure for Beaglebone black.

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 5:24:29 AM UTC-5, Madhu K wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am trying to compile the device tree.But I am getting below error while > compiling. Please help me to resolve this issue. > > Compilation issue : Error: am335x-boneblack.dts:10.1-9 syntax error > > Thanks &