Re: [beagleboard] Re: Implementation Board?

2014-04-20 Thread BBQTrader .
est you: > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/532391021/motherbonetmpionetm?ref=discovery > > On Friday, 18 April 2014 12:23:29 UTC+10, BBQTrader wrote: >> >> Thanks Tom! >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Tom Davies wrote: >> >>> BBQ -- depend

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Implementation Board?

2014-04-17 Thread BBQTrader .
Thanks Tom! On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Tom Davies wrote: > BBQ -- depending on your volume, you could desolder the headers, or get a > quote from CircuitCo for a run of BBBs without the headers installed, then > use male headers on your board soldered to the header holes on the BBB. > > P

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Implementation Board?

2014-04-16 Thread BBQTrader .
ly to terminals rather than the intermediate step of the cape. Thanks for your thoughts! BBQ On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Tom Davies wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 12:28:54 UTC+10, BBQTrader wrote: >> >> Gerald, >> >> I'm working on a Home

Re: [beagleboard] Implementation Board?

2014-04-15 Thread BBQTrader
Sorry! On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:44:34 AM UTC-4, Gerald wrote: > > I have no plans to make any such boards. I have all I can handle withe new > board under development. > > Gerald > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:28 PM, BBQTrader > > wrote: > &g

[beagleboard] Implementation Board?

2014-04-15 Thread BBQTrader
Gerald, I'm working on a Home Automation/Security System project, and am developing it for the BBB. I expect it to sit in a box for a long time, connected to the network, and connected to various sensors. I would like to have a board that had physical terminals on it rather than the headers,