Two things. First, I have had success with my bitbaked images. After I 
grabbed my console serial cable from work it seemed my boot was failing to 
find /dtbs/am355x...dtb for the bbb, so I created the folder on the boot 
partition and added the dtb file and it has since worked.

Second, while netboot is cool, it's not quite as cool as fastboot. Here is 
a fan review and tutorial for Android 
BBB<http://wiresareobsolete.com/wordpress/2013/11/fastboot-on-the-beaglebone-black/>
, AM335x eMMC 
booting<http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/AM335x_Android_eMMC_booting#What_is_fastboot.3F>doc
 by TI, and the succinct fastboot 
protocol 
here<https://gitorious.org/rowboat/bootable-bootloader-legacy/source/076ef94d61f349f7cf0fe776e60456d8f232cca5:fastboot_protocol.txt>
.

As it happens, I have just connected to u-boot from linux host using 
fastboot. Next steps are to see if I can boot or flash an Angstrom image 
over USB.

Cheers,
Joe Gorse

On Friday, February 28, 2014 7:51:11 PM UTC-5, john3909 wrote:
>
>
> From: Brandon I <brando...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
> Reply-To: <beagl...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>
> Date: Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM
> To: <beagl...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>
> Cc: <jhg...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
> Subject: Re: [beagleboard] How are the production BBB images built?
>
> > Maybe we can become free from SD cards in the near future for BBB 
> development.
>
> Doesn't uboot support network boot already?
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
> I use u-boot on my BBB to tftp zImage from my desktop and then mount 
> rootfs via NFS on my desktop. Is that what you want?
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:29:23 PM UTC-8, jhg...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Robert,
>>
>> Have you resolved any of these mysteries in the mean time?
>>
>> I got into this by trying to "bitbake" a simpler image, such as 
>> console-image, since I need no graphics or fancy webserver with node.js 
>> foo. So far I have failed to boot from the SD card with anything which has 
>> been made by the oebb.sh script or bitbake build system. Even Derek's 
>> 2-year-old 
>> instructions<http://derekmolloy.ie/building-angstrom-for-beaglebone-from-source/>seem
>>  not to work for "console-image".
>>
>> After I succeed at booting the BBB with my own custom image, I plan on 
>> updating u-boot to allow "fastboot", an feature more commonly supported by 
>> Android which allows one to boot or flash over USB, ethernet, etc. Maybe we 
>> can become free from SD cards in the near future for BBB development.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Joe
>>
>> On Friday, July 12, 2013 8:30:29 AM UTC-4, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Chris Morgan wrote: 
>>>
>>> > On Friday, July 12, 2013, Koen Kooi wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> >       Op 12 jul. 2013, om 13:46 heeft Robert P. J. Day <
>>> rpj...@crashcourse.ca> het 
>>> >       volgende geschreven: 
>>> > 
>>> >       > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Koen Kooi wrote: 
>>> >       > 
>>> >       >> It's all in the SRM, but for people too lazy to read that: 
>>> >       >> 
>>> >       >> ï¿1Ž2 ï¿1Ž2 ï¿1Ž2Read 
>>> http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom and follow the 
>>> >       steps outlined there. 
>>> >       > 
>>> >       > ï¿1Ž2gaaaaaah ... i am not interested in the general 
>>> philosophy of how to 
>>> >       > build angstrom, that's *not* the question on the table. the 
>>> question 
>>> >       > is, which *particular* configuration of angstrom is the one 
>>> that 
>>> >       > matches what is currently shipping on the BBB? 
>>> > 
>>> >       The one I linked above. There is only one configuration of 
>>> angstrom per release and 
>>> >       the above matches the release that ships with the bones. 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > Hello. 
>>> > 
>>> > I followed those instructions and, although I had selected the yocto 
>>> > 2013 release, I ended up with the component files in the deploy/ 
>>> > directory but as rootfs and ubi files, not card images. 
>>> > 
>>> > The information yesterday about the emmc-prepare.sh and other 
>>> > scripts has helped informationaly, I think I'll be able to build a 
>>> > sd card image today using those steps, but at this point it seems 
>>> > like a multi step process after following the angstrom build steps. 
>>>
>>>   actually, that's what i would have expected ... the primary purpose 
>>> of OE/yocto is to build the fundamental images or objects, not so much 
>>> to create the final bootable SD card image based on them, since some 
>>> people might not want an SD card, they might be, say, trying to 
>>> populate a TFTP or NFS server with those images. 
>>>
>>> rday 
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> ======================================================================== 
>>> Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA 
>>>                         http://crashcourse.ca
>>>
>>> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
>>> LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
>>> ========================================================================
>>
>> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to