On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> The page http://elinux.org/ARMCompilers should be removed ?
> Because http://elinux.org/Toolchains has more information and are more
> updated.
You should really discus it with the authors:
http://elinux.org/index.php?title=ARMCompilers&acti
I don't see why anything must be deleted. The ARMCompilers page is
specific to ARM, whereas the Toolchains page is more general. Feel
free to update either though.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> The page http://elinux.org/ARMCompilers should be removed ?
> Because http:/
The page http://elinux.org/ARMCompilers should be removed ?
Because http://elinux.org/Toolchains has more information and are more
updated.
--
Lucas A. Tanure Alves
+55 (19) 988176559
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Robert Nelson
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Lucas Tanure wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The page ARM Compilers seems a promotional page for Codesourcery. I would
> like to update this page, give more options for compilers etc.
> But, first I need to check if this information is true:
> " Enhancements are made in the Codes
Hi,
The page ARM Compilers seems a promotional page for Codesourcery. I would
like to update this page, give more options for compilers etc.
But, first I need to check if this information is true:
" Enhancements are made in the Codesourcery version first, and are then
pushed back to mainline."
Co
