Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2014-01-03 Thread Anguel
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:52:38 PM UTC+1, John Syne wrote: Graphics SDK: Graphics_SDK_5_00_00_01_hardfp Update Make.rules Desktop #make BUILD=release OMAPES=8.x PM_RUNTIME=1 all Desktop #sudo make BUILD=release OMAPES=8.x PM_RUNTIME=1 install This is no longer necessary. Run

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2014-01-03 Thread John Syne
From: Anguel anguel.stan...@gmail.com Reply-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Date: Friday, January 3, 2014 at 3:28 AM To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:52:38 PM UTC+1, John Syne wrote

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2014-01-03 Thread Anguel
On Friday, January 3, 2014 8:05:37 PM UTC+1, John Syne wrote: https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/tree/am33x-v3.12 Thanks! Anguel -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-27 Thread Daniel Metcalf
Syne jsyne...@us-power.com написал: From: John Syne jsyne...@us-power.com Reply-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, December 26, 2013 at 11:49 AM To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x From: Daniel Metcalf kb3

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-26 Thread Daniel Metcalf
-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Date: Monday, December 23, 2013 at 2:09 PM To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Subject: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x I finally got the toolchain built with Qt for Angstrom for my 32bit Fedora 20 laptop. I built the test program as shown

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-26 Thread John Syne
From: Daniel Metcalf kb3...@gmail.com Reply-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, December 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x John, I finally got the image I want and the toolchain

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-26 Thread Daniel Metcalf
Thanks John! The angstrom build system for v2013.06 builds kernel version 3.8.x. Seems like I have some work ahead of me. -- Dan Metcalf -- KB3UUN -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-26 Thread Maxim Podbereznyy
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x From: Daniel Metcalf kb3...@gmail.com Reply-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, December 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x John

[beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-23 Thread Daniel Metcalf
I finally got the toolchain built with Qt for Angstrom for my 32bit Fedora 20 laptop. I built the test program as shown in this video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP7uvOu9hoQ) and I can build the executable on my laptop. I then copied the executable to the BBB and tried to execute it a

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-23 Thread Daniel Metcalf
@googlegroups.com Subject: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x I finally got the toolchain built with Qt for Angstrom for my 32bit Fedora 20 laptop. I built the test program as shown in this video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP7uvOu9hoQ) and I can build the executable on my

Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x

2013-12-23 Thread John Syne
From: Daniel Metcalf kb3...@gmail.com Reply-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Date: Monday, December 23, 2013 at 4:54 PM To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Angstrom Toolchain (32-bit) and Qt 5.2.x John, Thank you for the heads up. I will look for you previous