Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-08 Thread YA
Hi Williams, I totally agree with you, thanks for your comment. Cheers, YA Le lundi 8 février 2016 22:54:56 UTC+1, William Hermans a écrit : > > *Many thanks for your help and for your amazing contribution to Linux for >> BBB.* >> > > Maybe nitpicking, and a point that perhaps Robert does not

Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-08 Thread William Hermans
> > *Many thanks for your help and for your amazing contribution to Linux for > BBB.* > Maybe nitpicking, and a point that perhaps Robert does not care to toot his own horn over . . . But Robert contributes to Linux for far more than just the BBB. In the context of beagle hardware, probably 5-6 bo

Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-08 Thread YA
You are right, I've done a mess with the I/O, Cape Bacon is now up and running ! Many thanks for your help and for your amazing contribution to Linux for BBB. Kind regards, YA Le dimanche 7 février 2016 23:55:38 UTC+1, RobertCNelson a écrit : > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, YA > > wrote:

Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-07 Thread Robert Nelson
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, YA wrote: > > Sorry I would like to say gpio0_5 (P9.17) and gpio0_4 (P9.18). > > "P9.17", /* shift: gpio0_5 LATCH */ > "P9.18", /* shift: gpio0_4 SERIAL */ > > These pins remain at 0 logic level. gpio0_4, gpio0_5, not gpio4/gpio5 that's another bank.. should be al

Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-07 Thread YA
Sorry I would like to say gpio0_5 (P9.17) and gpio0_4 (P9.18). "P9.17", /* shift: gpio0_5 LATCH */ "P9.18", /* shift: gpio0_4 SERIAL */ These pins remain at 0 logic level. YA Le dimanche 7 février 2016 23:29:14 UTC+1, RobertCNelson a écrit : > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:11 PM, YA > > wrote:

Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-07 Thread Robert Nelson
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:11 PM, YA wrote: > Hello Robert, > > Many thanks for your prompt reply. > > I would like to set the gpio4 & gpio5 (normally used for eMMC) as an output > but the logic level remains 0 even after echo 1 > value. So what do those pins have to do with the bacon cape? https:

Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-07 Thread YA
Hello Robert, Many thanks for your prompt reply. I would like to set the gpio4 & gpio5 (normally used for eMMC) as an output but the logic level remains 0 even after echo 1 > value. Regards, YA Le dimanche 7 février 2016 23:04:48 UTC+1, RobertCNelson a écrit : > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 3:58 P

Re: [beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-07 Thread Robert Nelson
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 3:58 PM, YA wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to add a Cape Bacon on a BBB rev A6 but I can't load & use the > specific device tree for this cape. > > I'm using Debian 7.9 for BBB on uSDCard. > > root@beaglebone:~# uname -a > > Linux beaglebone 3.8.13-bone79 #1 SMP Tue Oct 13

[beagleboard] Cape Bacon & device tree issue on a BBB with 3.8.13 kernel

2016-02-07 Thread YA
Hello, I would like to add a Cape Bacon on a BBB rev A6 but I can't load & use the specific device tree for this cape. I'm using Debian 7.9 for BBB on uSDCard. root@beaglebone:~# uname -a Linux beaglebone 3.8.13-bone79 #1 SMP Tue Oct 13 20:44:55 UTC 2015 armv7l GNU/Linux I've disabled HDMI &