Re: [beagleboard] Should we put ID EEPROM's on capes anymore?

Andrew, If I may do you make Capes? And if yes do you have a WEB site? Thanks -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails f

Re: [beagleboard] Should we put ID EEPROM's on capes anymore?

Thanks, Robert. Then I'll still install an EEPROM on my boards since there is still usefulness. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [beagleboard] Should we put ID EEPROM's on capes anymore?

On Tue, May 19, 2020, 8:33 PM Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Given that overlays have to be loaded at bootanyway, does it even make any > sense to keep adding EEPROM for identification? > Does your cape use the LCD interface? Or does it need to disable any onboard device? In that case, it's rec

[beagleboard] Should we put ID EEPROM's on capes anymore?

Given that overlays have to be loaded at bootanyway, does it even make any sense to keep adding EEPROM for identification? Thanks. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To un