I've noticed a difference in behavior between the latest Angstrom Linux
image and the latest Debian image available for the BeagleBone Black when
it comes to enumerating the real-time clocks present when a RTC "Cape" is
"present". [I have the actual clock present by use of a generic breakout
bo
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Justin Morgan wrote:
> I've noticed a difference in behavior between the latest Angstrom Linux
> image and the latest Debian image available for the BeagleBone Black when it
> comes to enumerating the real-time clocks present when a RTC "Cape" is
> "present". [I ha
On 6/12/14, 8:01 PM, "Robert Nelson" wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Justin Morgan wrote:
>> I've noticed a difference in behavior between the latest Angstrom Linux
>> image and the latest Debian image available for the BeagleBone Black
>>when it
>> comes to enumerating the real-time c
On 6/12/14, 8:41 PM, "John Syn" wrote:
>
>On 6/12/14, 8:01 PM, "Robert Nelson" wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Justin Morgan wrote:
>>> I've noticed a difference in behavior between the latest Angstrom Linux
>>> image and the latest Debian image available for the BeagleBone Black
>
Am 13.06.2014 05:01, schrieb Robert Nelson:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Justin Morgan wrote:
>> I've noticed a difference in behavior between the latest Angstrom Linux
>> image and the latest Debian image available for the BeagleBone Black when it
>> comes to enumerating the real-time clock
You could write a udev rule to make your RTC symlink to /dev/rtc0
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Alexander Holler
wrote:
> Am 13.06.2014 05:01, schrieb Robert Nelson:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Justin Morgan wrote:
> >> I've noticed a difference in behavior between the latest Angs
