: beagleboard
<beagleboard@googlegroups.com<mailto:beagleboard@googlegroups.com>>
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] BB-X15 Rev C Schematics & ewiki update?
Thanks Gerald. I did find the change sheet after a bit.
When you have alternatives like the Kingston vs Micron for eMMC and DDR parts,
>
>
> Gerald
>
>
>
> *From:* beagleboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:beagleboard@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *William A. Mills
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 3, 2017 3:32 PM
> *To:* beagleboard <beagleboard@googlegroups.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [beagleboard] BB-X15 Rev C
@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of William A. Mills
Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 3:32 PM
To: beagleboard <beagleboard@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] BB-X15 Rev C Schematics & ewiki update?
Thanks Gerald. I did find the change sheet after a bit.
When you have alternatives like the K
On Sep 3, 2017 3:32 PM, "William A. Mills" wrote:
Thanks Gerald. I did find the change sheet after a bit.
When you have alternatives like the Kingston vs Micron for eMMC and DDR
parts, who picks which one is used? The manufacturer (PTI)? Can it change
from one
t; a while back. But that was it. Nothing in the design itself changed.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* beagleboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:beagleboard@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *William A. Mills
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 3, 2017 12:11 PM
> *To:* beagleboard <beagleboard@googlegroups.com
] On
Behalf Of William A. Mills
Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 12:11 PM
To: beagleboard <beagleboard@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] BB-X15 Rev C Schematics & ewiki update?
Gerald,
Thanks. If that is all it is, then no hurry on the Rev C schematics. Jason
can just
... or I could just look at the "changes" sheet in the BOM excel!
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:10 PM, William A. Mills
wrote:
> Gerald,
>
> Thanks. If that is all it is, then no hurry on the Rev C schematics.
> Jason can just put a note on the wiki &| the github files stating
Gerald,
Thanks. If that is all it is, then no hurry on the Rev C schematics.
Jason can just put a note on the wiki &| the github files stating as much.
I am currently trying to diff the BOMs. diff is useless so it looks like I
will have to write a script.
Thanks,
Bill
--
For more
Yes, I can confirm that.
Rev C schematic is the same as the Rev B1 except for the processor revision.
I will create a Rev C schematic for you. I need to change the revision on each
page and add a 2.0 to the schematic symbols. That will not however, affect the
netlist.
Once I get this done,