Re: Formulas with variables in transaction legs

2024-06-04 Thread Martin Blais
Not that I'm aware of On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:25 AM Tino Didriksen wrote: > Was a solution ever found/made for this? Plugin or otherwise? > > I would also very much like some way to back-reference numbers. I've got > transactions like: > > 2024-01-02 * "Bs betaling MODSTRØM DANMARK A/S" > Asse

Re: links, vs tags vs meta

2024-06-04 Thread Chary Chary
Dan, thanks for a good summary! When I say, that tags and links cannot be grouped by in beanqueryI mean, exactly what you said, that you can't use *GROUP BY* tags or links like you can with meta (e.g. GROUP BY entry.meta['invoice'] ) It is a good point, that it is possible to group by a p

Re: links, vs tags vs meta

2024-06-04 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Links, tags, and metadata are facilities provided by beancount that do not really have a strictly defined role: they are building block for different workflows. Links are tags both allow to attach labels to transactions. As the name implies, links are generally used to link related transaction

Re: Formulas with variables in transaction legs

2024-06-04 Thread Tino Didriksen
Was a solution ever found/made for this? Plugin or otherwise? I would also very much like some way to back-reference numbers. I've got transactions like: 2024-01-02 * "Bs betaling MODSTRØM DANMARK A/S" Assets:Nordea:Tino:Primary -1036.65 DKK Liabilities:TDC:VAT:Y2024 (-1036.65 * 0.3 * 0.2 * -1)

Re: links, vs tags vs meta

2024-06-04 Thread Chary Chary
Sorry, correction to comparison table | tags | links | meta -- can be filtered by in beanquery | Yes | Yes | Yes No

links, vs tags vs meta

2024-06-04 Thread Chary Chary
Dear all, I am just trying to find the best solution for grouping postings in addition to them being grouped by accounts. Just want to check my understanding The obvious choices are are links, tags and meta >From your experience are there any specific reasons one would use one over another