Re: Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-24 Thread Martin Blais
Got it, I've managed to make it work and will keep it. On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:55 AM Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martin Blais [2021-09-23 16:54]: > > Does anyone use an Amount type as a metadata value? > > I use that feature for a non-profit. Our books are in USD but some > payments are in

Re: Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Blais [2021-09-23 16:54]: > Does anyone use an Amount type as a metadata value? I use that feature for a non-profit. Our books are in USD but some payments are in other currencies via Wise and I use meta-data to track that and run some checks. -- Martin Michlmayr

Re: Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-23 Thread James Cook
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 04:54:48PM -0400, Martin Blais wrote: > e.g. > > 2021-01-02 * "Some transaction" > real_value: 123.45 USD > ... > > Does anyone use an Amount type as a metadata value? > (If I can remove it in the new version it'll simplify grammar.) I use it a bit with plugins

Re: Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-23 Thread Martin Blais
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 8:48 PM Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > On 23/09/2021 22:54, Martin Blais wrote: > > e.g. > > > > 2021-01-02 * "Some transaction" > > real_value: 123.45 USD > > ... > > > > Does anyone use an Amount type as a metadata value? > > (If I can remove it in the new version

Re: Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-23 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 23/09/2021 22:54, Martin Blais wrote: > e.g.  > >   2021-01-02 * "Some transaction" >     real_value: 123.45 USD >     ... > > Does anyone use an Amount type as a metadata value? > (If I can remove it in the new version it'll simplify grammar.) I use it a lot. I could live without it, but if

Re: Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-23 Thread redst...@gmail.com
Yes, I do, and I have scripting that works with these as well. I won't complain much if it's removed though, and can use a workaround like the one Ben suggested. Same question as Ben: I assumed the grammar will still allow all remaining datatypes like dates, bool, ints, etc.? On Thursday,

Re: Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-23 Thread 'Patrick Ruckstuhl' via Beancount
Similar here, in my case I use already a string for it, this is only informational so a string is good enough. On September 23, 2021 11:03:07 PM GMT+02:00, Ben Blount wrote: >I don't, and it seems like it would be fine to have a single valued >metadata. I assume the grammar will require the key

Does anybody use (number, currency) amounts in metadata?

2021-09-23 Thread Martin Blais
e.g. 2021-01-02 * "Some transaction" real_value: 123.45 USD ... Does anyone use an Amount type as a metadata value? (If I can remove it in the new version it'll simplify grammar.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To