On 03.04.2008, at 04:52, Rob Rothwell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Rob" == Rob Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Is one not supposed to make subclasses of these classes, and if
so, why not?
Generally, your object "has
On 03.04.2008, at 07:49, Ramon Leon wrote:
Yeah, shortly after I posted that, I remembered that. :)
Also, for the beginners. you need to initialize dateCache to
a Dictionary.
the normal way to do that is to have an instance side method called
#initialize:
initialize
super
> Sure, for simple stuff, one-class-is-one-table might make
> sense, but pay attention to the other kinds of mapping
> styles. Lots of power in there. It's how an ORM *should* be done.
>
> --
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. -
Rails has made it pretty clear that *m
>
> Yeah, shortly after I posted that, I remembered that. :)
>
> Also, for the beginners. you need to initialize dateCache to
> a Dictionary.
> the normal way to do that is to have an instance side method called
> #initialize:
>
> initialize
> super initialize. "NEVER NE
> "Rob" == Rob Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Has anyone written anything like the ActiveRecord for Glorp?
Using something like ActiveRecord for Glorp would be like buying an airplane
just to taxi around the airport without ever lifting off the ground.
The big plus in Glorp that I
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > "Rob" == Rob Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rob> Is one not supposed to make subclasses of these classes, and if so,
> why not?
>
> Generally, your object "has a" collection, but doesn't qualify to be
Has anyone written anything like the ActiveRecord for Glorp? VW7.6 has
something, but it would be slightly painful to port (for me at least) as it
uses VW Package definitions and a few other things I am not familiar with.
I know Ramon did something that used Magritte, but I am not using that in m
> "Rob" == Rob Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Is one not supposed to make subclasses of these classes, and if so, why
not?
Generally, your object "has a" collection, but doesn't qualify to be "is a"
collection. If you really want to subclass collection classes, you need
to peer d
If I create a simple object subclassed from Collection,
SequenceableCollection, or ArrayedCollection called CollectionObject, with
CollectionObject>>#initialize
self halt.
and execute:
CollectionObject new.
the halt is executed.
Whereas, if I subclass CollectionObject from:
Set
Dictionar
> "Ramon" == Ramon Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ramon> Or more idiomatic...
Ramon> ^dateCache at: dateString ifAbsentPut: [Date from: dateString].
Yeah, shortly after I posted that, I remembered that. :)
Also, for the beginners. you need to initialize dateCache to a Dictionary.
the norm
>
> Implement a simple cache:
>
>^dateCache at: dateString ifAbsent:
> [dateCache at: dateString put: (Date from: dateString)].
>
> something like that.
>
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777
0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Or more idiomatic...
^dateCach
> "stan" == stan shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
stan> Is there a more efficient way? Is there a standard method I've missed?
One thing you should ensure is that you're not converting the same date twice.
Typical logs have thousands of entries all with the same date, and I've seen
far to
cient date parsing
>
>
> I have a large file with dates in the format '2001-11-04'. As
> I couldn't find a method to change to date, I'm doing:
> date := self dateFrom: (dateString subStrings: '-').
>
> dateFrom: anArray
> "anArray should be like #('2005' '09' '06')"
> ^Date
I have a large file with dates in the format '2001-11-04'. As I couldn't find
a method to change to date, I'm doing:
date := self dateFrom: (dateString subStrings: '-').
dateFrom: anArray
"anArray should be like #('2005' '09' '06')"
^Date year: anArray first asInteger month
David Finlayson wrote:
I am considering developing an application in Squeak for the analysis
and processing of sonar data. The most interesting part of the program
is a visual analysis tool that would be used for filtering, mosaicking
and GIS-type analysis. Superficially, it would resemble and in
I am considering developing an application in Squeak for the analysis
and processing of sonar data. The most interesting part of the program
is a visual analysis tool that would be used for filtering, mosaicking
and GIS-type analysis. Superficially, it would resemble and indeed
work a lot like a ph
16 matches
Mail list logo
