Fair enough.
Clinton
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
> At Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:03:30 -0600,
> Clinton Blackmore wrote:
> >
> > Would it be easier to bring Scratch forward to run on a newer version of
> Squeak?
>
> Hmm, I think that would be so much more work, compared to
At Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:03:30 -0600,
Clinton Blackmore wrote:
>
> Would it be easier to bring Scratch forward to run on a newer version of
> Squeak?
Hmm, I think that would be so much more work, compared to for
example bringing in the InterpreterSimulator into the Scratch image.
-- Yoshiki
> O
Would it be easier to bring Scratch forward to run on a newer version of
Squeak?
Clinton
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
> At Fri, 28 May 2010 10:55:31 -0600,
> Clinton Blackmore wrote:
> >
> > Very interesting. It looks like I will probably not get to try any of
> thes
At Fri, 28 May 2010 10:55:31 -0600,
Clinton Blackmore wrote:
>
> Very interesting. It looks like I will probably not get to try any of these
> methods until next week, but, what sort of
> adjustments do you think it would need for Scratch images?
The biggest single issue is that my ImageBrows
