On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:56 , stephane ducasse wrote:
On 20 févr. 07, at 21:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 20, 2007, at 21:28 , George Herolyants wrote:
Thanks for this answer, Ron. But actually I'm not confused with
order in wich '1' and '2' presents in result line. I can't
understa
On 20 févr. 07, at 21:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 20, 2007, at 21:28 , George Herolyants wrote:
Thanks for this answer, Ron. But actually I'm not confused with
order in wich '1' and '2' presents in result line. I can't
understand why in some cases this code results ten '1' and ten
Ron, Michael and Bert, thank you very much for your help!
George
___
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
On Feb 20, 2007, at 21:28 , George Herolyants wrote:
Thanks for this answer, Ron. But actually I'm not confused with
order in wich '1' and '2' presents in result line. I can't
understand why in some cases this code results ten '1' and ten '2'
and in some cases it results ten '2' and only n
sage-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:beginners-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Herolyants
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:28 PM
> To: A friendly place to get answers to even the most basic questions
> aboutSqueak.
> Subject: Re: [Newbies] BlockClosure>>fork
Thanks, Michael!
Now I know, that it isn't a problem of BlockClosure's fork method, but a
specific behaviour of Transcript. Code you give in your message result
the same line as VW.
George
___
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.o
Thanks for this answer, Ron. But actually I'm not confused with order in
wich '1' and '2' presents in result line. I can't understand why in some
cases this code results ten '1' and ten '2' and in some cases it results
ten '2' and only nine '1'?
___
B
George,
You'll find that writing to the Transcript always slows things down. I
assume it's the time for writing to the Transcript that also causes
the second process to start after a different interval each time.
Writing the results into an OrderedCollection will be much faster, and
more predicta
Hi George,
I'm not sure what you expect to happen. The code you are running basically
says go off on your own and do something. A fork creates a different thread
that processes instructions on its own, but the two processes are not
coordinated the scheduler just gives them time when it can. No
Hi all,
I'm new to Smalltalk and Squeak and I have a question.
I tried some examples from chapter Processes from "Smalltalk by Example"
book. I executed the following code several times but the output was
quite different as I suppose and differed from time to time.
Furthermore evaluation went a
10 matches
Mail list logo