Thanks for the enhancement. It seems to me that the implementation is
case-specific and could be implemented using the equivalent SQL calls
without changing the PostgresV2 code. In any case, the squeaksource
project is world writable, so you can add an enhanced version yourself.
What I would
Hi,
if I call:
conn execute: 'select * from one_milion_table'
it seems that all table rows are loaded into memory - right?
Is there an easy way to only iterate (do:) result set records without
internal loading bulky resultset into some sort of internal arrays?
Thanks, pf
smime.p7s
This should help you...
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general/109157
I don't know if there is an API in newer versions from Postgresql where
you can query the number in the result set.
Regards,
Franz Josef
Petr Fischer schrieb:
Hi,
if I call:
conn execute:
OK. I implemented this functionality. Look at comment in method:
PGConnectionexecute: sqlString withRowBlock: aRowBlock
Is possible to add attached changesets to PostgresV2 package? (by
Yanni Chiu)
Thanks, pf
On 27.11.2007, at 17:01, Franz Josef Konrad wrote:
This should help you...
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 19:23 +0100, Petr Fischer wrote:
OK. I implemented this functionality. Look at comment in method:
PGConnectionexecute: sqlString withRowBlock: aRowBlock
Is possible to add attached changesets to PostgresV2 package? (by
Yanni Chiu)
Just publish your changes on
