Klaus D. Witzel a écrit :
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:59:57 +0100, nicolas cellier wrote:
...
I see, become: does exchange #identityHash, and that makes our
IdentityDictionary work, god thanks, but there is no such provision
for ordinary #hash and Dictionary...
But there are sufficient provisions
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:12:57 +0100, nicolas cellier wrote:
Klaus D. Witzel a écrit :
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:59:57 +0100, nicolas cellier wrote:
...
I see, become: does exchange #identityHash, and that makes our
IdentityDictionary work, god thanks, but there is no such provision
for ordinar
Klaus D. Witzel a écrit :
Wouldn't this deserve a longer (Dictionary comment) ?
You're right, the invariant is *essential* for Set and its subclasses,
alas no word about it in its class comment. Please open a bug report
(with severity "text"); current policy is that this then gets included
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:44:05 +0100, nicolas cellier wrote:
Klaus D. Witzel a écrit :
Wouldn't this deserve a longer (Dictionary comment) ?
You're right, the invariant is *essential* for Set and its subclasses,
alas no word about it in its class comment. Please open a bug report
(with seve
