At 10:46 PM -0400 5/1/11, shawn wilson wrote:
jim, you setup your boxes a certain way to make sure this doesn't fail?
No. The systems are plain vanilla Red Hat Linux (old versions because
they run proprietary software).
so, the problems i see with this:
1. password schema - newer systems
Have a date:
2011-05-02-16:40:51
Using this to get it:
$tm = gmtime;
$time_stamp = sprintf "%04d-%02d-%02d-%02d:%02d:%02d",
$tm->year + 1900, $tm->mon + 1, $tm->mday, $tm->hour, $tm->min, $tm->sec;
print "$time_stamp\n";
I need to round it to nearest 5 minute point.
2011-05-02-16:40:51
needs
> "M" == Matt writes:
M> Have a date:
M> 2011-05-02-16:40:51
M> Using this to get it:
M> $tm = gmtime;
M> $time_stamp = sprintf "%04d-%02d-%02d-%02d:%02d:%02d",
M> $tm->year + 1900, $tm->mon + 1, $tm->mday, $tm->hour, $tm->min, $tm->sec;
M> print "$time_stamp\n";
use POSIX
On 5/2/11 Mon May 2, 2011 9:46 AM, "Matt" scribbled:
> Have a date:
>
> 2011-05-02-16:40:51
>
> Using this to get it:
>
> $tm = gmtime;
> $time_stamp = sprintf "%04d-%02d-%02d-%02d:%02d:%02d",
> $tm->year + 1900, $tm->mon + 1, $tm->mday, $tm->hour, $tm->min, $tm->sec;
> print "$time_stamp\n
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 08:17, Jim Gibson wrote:
>
> At 10:46 PM -0400 5/1/11, shawn wilson wrote:
>>
>> jim, you setup your boxes a certain way to make sure this doesn't fail?
>
>
> No. The systems are plain vanilla Red Hat Linux (old versions because they
> run proprietary software).
>
>>
>> so,
On May 2, 2011 2:14 PM, "Kenneth Wolcott" wrote:
>
> It looks like you have a great working system for annually forcing
> the change of UNIX passwords in a systematic manner, but it would
> definitely not be good to emulate your system in the general case
> because very few people on this list (
