it before being fed into use
lib (or other adjustment to '@INC').
--
: David Lee
: ECMWF (Data Handling System)
: Shinfield Park
: Reading RG2 9AX
: Berkshire
:
: tel:+44-118-9499 362
: email: david@ecmwf.int
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e
/vendor
etc.) might possibly work, there may be local administrative resistance
to such a course of action across our ranges of systems, administered by
other people, that need this application.)
--
: David Lee
: ECMWF (Data Handling System)
: Shinfield Park
: Reading RG2 9AX
: Berkshire
:
: tel
Philip Potter wrote:
2009/11/4 David Lee david@ecmwf.int:
[...]
Anyway, your explanation was useful and gives us sufficient to decide how to
address our local use of these numbers. (In our case, they are
human-oriented accumulated byte-counts, for which we don't actually need
byte-counts, for which we don't actually need
that significance/precision.)
Thanks.
--
: David Lee
: ECMWF (Data Handling System)
: Shinfield Park
: Reading RG2 9AX
: Berkshire
:
: tel:+44-118-9499 362
: email: david@ecmwf.int
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
documentation about this surprise. Is this a
program bug or a documentation bug? (Or a self bug?)
Is there a more appropriate forum than beginn...@... to raise this?
--
: David Lee
: ECMWF (Data Handling System)
: Shinfield Park
: Reading RG2 9AX
: Berkshire
:
: tel:+44-118-9499 362
: email