Image::Magick Montage usage

2004-03-10 Thread Taylor James
Hi there, I have 189 gif images at 200x200 and I want to combine them in a 3x61 arrangement, ending up with a 600x12200 gif. Firstly is this just crazy talk? I realise this is a large image, but I've dealt with larger in the past. Secondly, what the hell am I doing wrong!? My code is below. I

Re: Image::Magick Montage usage

2004-03-10 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
Hi there, I have 189 gif images at 200x200 and I want to combine them in a 3x61 arrangement, ending up with a 600x12200 gif. Firstly is this just crazy talk? I realise this is a large image, but I've dealt with larger in the past. As long as you have the resources... Secondly, what

RE: Image::Magick Montage usage

2004-03-10 Thread Taylor James
Wiggins d Anconia wrote: HTH, Indeed, you're right of course. I have a hunch that this is more than a resource issue, but of course I should try using less images first to eliminate it as a possibility. I'll try later and let you know how I get on. I was kind of hoping someone would spot an

RE: Image::Magick Montage usage

2004-03-10 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
Wiggins d Anconia wrote: HTH, Indeed, you're right of course. I have a hunch that this is more than a resource issue, but of course I should try using less images first to eliminate it as a possibility. I'll try later and let you know how I get on. I was kind of hoping someone

RE: Image::Magick Montage usage

2004-03-10 Thread Taylor James
Wiggins d Anconia wrote: I also notice that you catch the return result of 'Write' and then warn if it is positive, but 'Write' returns the number of images written, so it should be positive. I suspect this is because it is just test code, but you will likely need to correct that before

RE: Image::Magick Montage usage

2004-03-10 Thread Taylor James
Taylor James wrote: Another good idea, which I shall try tonight along with the others, or this afternoon if I can get Image::Magick installed on my work PC. That's another story! Done that, and revised the code as discussed earlier and it still seems to be hangign at the same point (just