Re: Installing Date::Calc

2007-12-05 Thread Gerald Wheeler
Peter, Installing GCC on the box would be a major problem and one that I would rather not get into. Why does Perl assume (if this is the case) that everyone who uses perl has access to a compiler?? I can not believe that most perl users have access to a C compiler? One would think that at

Re: Installing Date::Calc

2007-12-05 Thread Tom Phoenix
On 12/5/07, Gerald Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Installing GCC on the box would be a major problem and one that I would rather not get into. Having a C compiler would probably make your life easier in the long run. And, unless you've got a seriously weird box, installing GCC is

Re: Installing Date::Calc

2007-12-05 Thread Eko Budiharto
It is strange that C compiler does not include in the first time installation. I installed solaris 8 and Fedora, red hat, I always get C compiler when I installed the OS and I rarely does not get C compiler. Only last time, I installed Date::Calc in my FC6 machine, it was asked the newest GCC

Re: Installing Date::Calc

2007-12-04 Thread Peter Scott
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:40:16 -0700, Gerald Wheeler wrote: It appears that installing the prerequisites for Date::Calc (Bit::Vector) requires a C compiler. Is there any way to install Date::Calc (and it's prerequisites) when one does not have the capability to compile the module? Are

Installing Date::Calc

2007-12-03 Thread Gerald Wheeler
It appears that installing the prerequisites for Date::Calc (Bit::Vector) requires a C compiler. Is there any way to install Date::Calc (and it's prerequisites) when one does not have the capability to compile the module? Are precompiled modules for Solaris 10 SPARC available form somewhere?