(My apologies if these are redundant observations for this mailing list
community)
Also note for anyone who wonders "what's up with this Perl6 thing?" that,
despite the name, "Perl6" is a VERY different programming language than
Perl5.
Perl6 is not Perl5 with some impro
Hi Wah Peng,
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:30:20 +0800
Wah Peng wrote:
> Hello members,
>
> Do you know if perl6 the first version will get released this Xmas day?
>
I believe that the plan is that the first “stable” version of a Perl 6
implementation will be released by Christmas thi
Hello members,
Do you know if perl6 the first version will get released this Xmas day?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 02:46:01 Steve Bertrand wrote:
> All,
>
> Can those who have experience comment with their opinions? Perhaps this
> isn't a newb question, but hopefully many have heard about Perl6 [1].
>
> Which changes do you like? What changes don
Telemachus wrote:
> I've been following Perl6 via these links. You may find some good reading
> at one or another of these:
>
> http://szabgab.com/perl6_tricks_and_treats.html
> http://perlgeek.de/blog-en/perl-5-to-6/
> http://perlgeek.de/blog-en/perl-6/
>
> You c
I've been following Perl6 via these links. You may find some good reading
at one or another of these:
http://szabgab.com/perl6_tricks_and_treats.html
http://perlgeek.de/blog-en/perl-5-to-6/
http://perlgeek.de/blog-en/perl-6/
You can also find some interesting projects on Github that are
Uri Guttman wrote:
> this list is not the
> place to discuss this.
Ok.
Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
>>>>> "SB" == Steve Bertrand writes:
SB> All, Can those who have experience comment with their opinions?
SB> Perhaps this isn't a newb question, but hopefully many have heard
SB> about Perl6 [1].
it isn't a newbie question at all. there is plent
All,
Can those who have experience comment with their opinions? Perhaps this
isn't a newb question, but hopefully many have heard about Perl6 [1].
Which changes do you like? What changes don't you like? Are any of you
developing programs that are strictly Perl6?
Would it be worth att
Ken Foskey wrote:
> I have a script that takes an sql and formats into a report, simple
> stuff.
>
> I have a product that when it changes I want a sub heading. I have
> coded this.
>
> if( $prior_product ne $sql_product ) {
> print form...
> $prior_product = $sql_product;
> }
>
> Is there
I have a script that takes an sql and formats into a report, simple
stuff.
I have a product that when it changes I want a sub heading. I have
coded this.
if( $prior_product ne $sql_product ) {
print form...
$prior_product = $sql_product;
}
Is there a better way to code this sort of rep
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 11:17, Nikola Janceski wrote:
> uh... '->' is used as a dereferencer also, but I also dereference my code as
> so..
>
> $value = $$ref2hash{'key'};
> @slice = @$ref2array[0 .. 2];
>
> I really need to find the time to read the Articles but between work and
> taxes
>
>
om: Chas Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:55 AM
> To: Timothy Johnson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: perl6
>
>
> On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 10:39, Timothy Johnson wrote:
> >
> > At the risk of beating a dead and bloated horse, I hav
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 10:39, Timothy Johnson wrote:
>
> At the risk of beating a dead and bloated horse, I have no doubt that I will
> enjoy and take advantages of the improvements in Perl6, but I still don't
> see the logic in changing operators. I mean, why make old code u
Timothy Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>
*>At the risk of beating a dead and bloated horse, I have no doubt that I will
*>enjoy and take advantages of the improvements in Perl6, but I still don't
*>see the logic in changing operators. I mean, why make old code unusable?
*&
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 10:39, Timothy Johnson wrote:
>
> At the risk of beating a dead and bloated horse, I have no doubt that I will
> enjoy and take advantages of the improvements in Perl6, but I still don't
> see the logic in changing operators. I mean, why make old code u
> At the risk of beating a dead and bloated horse, I have no doubt that I will
> enjoy and take advantages of the improvements in Perl6, but I still don't
> see the logic in changing operators. I mean, why make old code unusable?
> If you can make a Perl5->6 converter, why
At the risk of beating a dead and bloated horse, I have no doubt that I will
enjoy and take advantages of the improvements in Perl6, but I still don't
see the logic in changing operators. I mean, why make old code unusable?
If you can make a Perl5->6 converter, why can't you in
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 03:25, peter grotz wrote:
> > variable sigils ($@%) are now constant (ie you say
> >@array[2] instead of $array[2]), the concatenation operator is
> changing
> >from '.' to ' - ' (note the whitespace), the member of operator '->' is
>
> >changing to '.', and various other s
> what at hell should these changes help us? I´m using perl 5.6.1 now for
> a long time and I don´t wanna change my kind of writing my progs, only
> because some mastermind thinks that he must change the good old!!
There are many better changes, including:
* Parrot (the interpreter) will be easi
> variable sigils ($@%) are now constant (ie you say
>@array[2] instead of $array[2]), the concatenation operator is
changing
>from '.' to ' - ' (note the whitespace), the member of operator '->' is
>changing to '.', and various other small things.
what at hell should these changes help us? I´m
This is just my survey of one small but (imo)
important aspect of perl 6. It will take about
two minutes and six mouse clicks to do it.
I will collate all answers and report to the
people who are designing Perl 6 (including
Larry Wall of course).
http://www.self-reference.com/cgi-bin/perl6plural
22 matches
Mail list logo
