Re: FW: Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens

2016-09-01 Thread Neil Hainer
PM > *To:* 'Aaron Wells' > *Subject:* RE: Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens > > > > Thank you all for sharing your perspective on this. I will compare both > the first and second editions of *Beginning Perl*. Cozens’ writing style > really resonates with me,

Re: Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens

2016-09-01 Thread Neil Hainer
I agree about starting with Learning Perl. It so happens that a new edition is about to become available. The following URL is from The Learning Perl website: https://www.learning-perl.com/2016/08/pre-order-learning-perl-7th-edition/ On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Hao Wu

FW: Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens

2016-09-01 Thread Walker, Michael E
From: Walker, Michael E Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 12:47 PM To: 'Aaron Wells' Subject: RE: Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens Thank you all for sharing your perspective on this. I will compare both the first and second editions of Beginning Perl. Cozens’ writing style really

Re: Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens

2016-09-01 Thread Илья Рассадин
Hi! For introduction to Modern Perl practicies, read Modern Perl by chromatic http://modernperlbooks.com/books/modern_perl_2016/index.html 01.09.16 19:52, Walker, Michael E пишет: Hi, even though _Beginning Perl_ dates back to 2000, is it still relevant for learning today? I wondered,

Re: Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens

2016-09-01 Thread Hao Wu
https://www.amazon.com/Beginning-Perl-Curtis-Poe/dp/1118013840 This one is more relevant. I read it and it is very good. However, If you never programming before Learning Perl probably is better to start with. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Walker, Michael E < michael.e.walk...@boeing.com>

Question about Beginning Perl by Simon Cozens

2016-09-01 Thread Walker, Michael E
Hi, even though Beginning Perl dates back to 2000, is it still relevant for learning today? I wondered, because when Googling, I saw posts recommending against its use, but yet it is still listed at books.perl.org. Please discuss, or point me to the archive on this list where this has been