Ing. Branislav Gerzo [IBG], on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 13:03
(+0100) wrote:
IBG> I think this is nice example for recursive function, do you agree ?
I agree too :)
IBG> Ok, I am code that, so I am looking for your suggestions, too :)
Ok, here is my solution, not the best one, because it
Ing. Branislav Gerzo [IBG], on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 14:28
(+0100) wrote these comments:
IBG> Ok, here is my solution, not the best one, because it return random
IBG> value if max is not exactly defined (we ends with the same values for
IBG> strings)
ok, if anyone interested - I change i
Ing. Branislav Gerzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I have:
:
: my @array = ( '1/2/1',
: '1/2/2',
: '1/4/2',
: '2/1/1',
: '2/1/1',
: '3/1/1' );
What is it representative of? What is the application?
Will there be only didgit
Charles K. Clarkson [CKC], on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 08:32
(-0600) thinks about:
CKC> What is it representative of? What is the application?
CKC> Will there be only didgits? What is the range of values
CKC> available.
It will be not digits, I give bad example, I should use some words.
Charles K. Clarkson [CKC], on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 08:32
(-0600) wrote about:
CKC> What is it representative of? What is the application?
CKC> Will there be only didgits? What is the range of values
CKC> available.
ok, I rewrote that script a bit, the best solution to me is using
"s
Ing. Branislav Gerzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Charles K. Clarkson [CKC], on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at
: 08:32 (-0600) wrote about:
:
: : What is it representative of? What is the application?
: : Will there be only didgits? What is the range of values
: : available.
:
: ok, I rewro
