Hello,
The Os was windows and use of start along with system is working fine.
Thanks & Regards
a b
On 2/28/06, Timothy Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What operating system are you running, and how important is the return
> code to you?
>
> If you are using Windows, for example, you can
What operating system are you running, and how important is the return
code to you?
If you are using Windows, for example, you can use the start or call
commands along with system() to spawn a process and immediately return.
The only problem is that you won't be able to check the return code,
bec
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >a.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >b.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >c.txt");
and,I'm a little strange here. if your first 'exec' is executed
successfully,the main script process should be replaced with the exec call.In
other words,the executing of 'wperl hang.pl >a.txt' shoul
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >a.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >b.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >c.txt");
>
hi,
here I think you could fork the childs,and call the 'exec' in childs,it should
be good for your purpose.
for example,
for (my $i=0;$i<3;$i++){
my $child = fork();die "can't fork $!" unless
a b wrote:
Here i want to execute one and then execute another but don't wait for
previous command i.e.something in background but im unable to do it.
see:
perldoc -q 'How do I start a process in the background?'
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
