shawn wilson wrote:
Oh, I guess I was thinking that using the file name repeats the stat
(which it does). Since I was complaining about the ugliness of '_'.
However, you're right - that works as well as (-f _)<-- that doesn't
look weird as shit? I've got issues moving my fingers into typing
that
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:32 PM, John W. Krahn wrote:
> Shaji Kalidasan wrote:
>
> or stat() or lstat()
I don't remember seeing that reusing i?stat would not duplicate the
stat call...?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@p
Shaji Kalidasan wrote:
You can use more than one file test on the same file to create a
complex logical condition.
Suppose you only want to operate on files that are both readable and
writable; you check each attribute and combine them with and:
if (-r $file and -w $file) {
...
}
Each time
Thank y'all.
That's weird to read, but it makes sense easy enough.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Brian Fraser wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:05 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
>>
>> From Archive::Tar::File - what's '_' and where is it documented?
>>
>> sub _filetype {
>> my $self = shift;
>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:05 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> From Archive::Tar::File - what's '_' and where is it documented?
>
> sub _filetype {
> my $self = shift;
> my $file = shift;
>
> return unless defined $file;
>
> return SYMLINK if (-l $file); # Symlink
>
> return FI
Dear Shawn,
You can use more than one file test on the same file to create a complex
logical condition.
Suppose you only want to operate on files that are both readable and writable;
you check each attribute and combine them with and:
if (-r $file and -w $file) {
...
}
Each time you perform
