Re: Tail call optimization

2002-06-05 Thread Jenda Krynicky
recently that would have been improved in one place by its use. But I still have a question :). As I understand it when tail-call optimization is done automatically there are two advantages. One is that the stack doesn't grow out of control, so that you don't have to worry about blowing it up

Re: Tail call optimization

2002-06-03 Thread Tagore Smith
have been improved in one place by its use. But I still have a question :). As I understand it when tail-call optimization is done automatically there are two advantages. One is that the stack doesn't grow out of control, so that you don't have to worry about blowing it up if you recurse very

Re: Tail call optimization

2002-06-02 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: Tagore Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Tail call optimization Date sent: Tue, 28 May 2002 23:42:30 -0400 I came across this statement on the web: Perl ... supports the tail-call optimization

Tail call optimization

2002-05-28 Thread Tagore Smith
I came across this statement on the web: Perl ... supports the tail-call optimization (although you have to do it by hand). I was wondering if someone could give me an example of this. I know what tail-call optimization means, and how to write tail-recursive functions, in Lisp- just not sure