On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:16:16 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
PS == Peter Scott pe...@psdt.com writes:
PS On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:16:27 +0800, Tim Bowden wrote:
I've just realised I almost never use named arrays or hashes
anymore. It's almost always anonymous references instead. That
PS == Peter Scott pe...@psdt.com writes:
PS On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:16:27 +0800, Tim Bowden wrote:
I've just realised I almost never use named arrays or hashes anymore.
It's almost always anonymous references instead. That lead me to wonder
what criteria experienced perl hackers have
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:16:27 +0800, Tim Bowden wrote:
I've just realised I almost never use named arrays or hashes anymore.
It's almost always anonymous references instead. That lead me to wonder
what criteria experienced perl hackers have as to when to use a named
array or hash, and when to
I've just realised I almost never use named arrays or hashes anymore.
It's almost always anonymous references instead. That lead me to wonder
what criteria experienced perl hackers have as to when to use a named
array or hash, and when to start with an anonymous ref instead. My very
informal
On Monday 26 Apr 2010 17:16:27 Tim Bowden wrote:
I've just realised I almost never use named arrays or hashes anymore.
It's almost always anonymous references instead. That lead me to wonder
what criteria experienced perl hackers have as to when to use a named
array or hash, and when to start
