Hi all,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:25:23 +0300
Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 08:22:13 +0100
> From: John Delacour
> To: Shlomi Fish
> Subject: Re: Who instantiated an object
>
>
> On 1/6/13 at 11:57, shlo...@s
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 08:22:13 +0100
From: John Delacour
To: Shlomi Fish
Subject: Re: Who instantiated an object
On 1/6/13 at 11:57, shlo...@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) wrote:
>These links got broken due to word-wrapping. Here are the better links:
ht
Hi all,
On 1 Jun 2013 03:11:01 -
Peter Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:13:29 +, Weidner, Ron wrote:
> >my ( $proto, $common, $name, $options ) = @_;
> > my $class = ref($proto) || $proto;
>
> That is a common bit of cargo-culting that you might want to rethink. I
>
Hi,
On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:13:29 +
"Weidner, Ron" wrote:
> I have and object with a function called new. (seen below). What I want to
> do is instead of simply calling die I want to know who called "new" without
> the required params. (like a stacktrace) I've tried confess, longmess, and
On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:13:29 +, Weidner, Ron wrote:
>my ( $proto, $common, $name, $options ) = @_;
>my $class = ref($proto) || $proto;
That is a common bit of cargo-culting that you might want to rethink. I
know it's posted all over the place but it's generally considered a
On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:13:29 +
"Weidner, Ron" wrote:
> I have and object with a function called new. (seen below). What I
> want to do is instead of simply calling die I want to know who called
> "new" without the required params. (like a stacktrace) I've tried
> confess, longmess, and cal
I have and object with a function called new. (seen below). What I want to do
is instead of simply calling die I want to know who called "new" without the
required params. (like a stacktrace) I've tried confess, longmess, and caller
and they did not produce the caller of new.
#!/usr/bin/perl
