Re: goto command

2004-01-30 Thread Noah Ganter
The reason why the goto command is not generally used in perl (and other languages) is that it does not force the developer to have a theoretical framework for the program. It creates 'spagetti code' where a person working on the code or trying to understand what the developer has done has

goto command

2004-01-29 Thread Thomas Browner
Does perl have a goto command. For example if you tell scrip to do something and it returns a 1 then it should go to a block of code that does something else. Thanks, Thomas Browner -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: goto command

2004-01-29 Thread wolf blaum
For Quality purpouses, Thomas Browner 's mail on Thursday 29 January 2004 18:46 may have been monitored or recorded as: Does perl have a goto command. For example if you tell scrip to do something and it returns a 1 then it should go to a block of code that does something else. Not talking

Re: goto command

2004-01-29 Thread Rob Dixon
Thomas Browner wrote: Does perl have a goto command. For example if you tell scrip to do something and it returns a 1 then it should go to a block of code that does something else. Yes. But I've never seen a case where I think it should be used. Perl isn't a scripting language. (Although

RE: goto command

2004-01-29 Thread Paul Kraus
- From: Thomas Browner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: goto command Does perl have a goto command. For example if you tell scrip to do something and it returns a 1 then it should go to a block of code that does something else

RE: goto command

2004-01-29 Thread Wagner, David --- Senior Programmer Analyst --- WGO
Browner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 09:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: goto command Does perl have a goto command. For example if you tell scrip to do something and it returns a 1 then it should go to a block of code that does something else. Thanks, Thomas Browner