On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 07:38 , Kipp, James wrote:
so which is better? to make a lib file with functions or a modular/OOP pm
file ?
technically this is a false dichotomy. you can not tell
if the file BAR.pm is an OO style Perl Module, or merely
a Functional/Proceduralist style Perl
so far all my libs (well there ain't much ) are all OO pm files.
There is what I would call the 'dataLess' OO solution,
what is known as a 'utility class' - where one has only
a stack of methods that one wishes to have in a 'nameSpaceSafe'
environment - so that you know that
my
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 10:11 , Timothy Johnson wrote:
[..]
If you put the module above in a file called UC.pm in the site/lib/Tim
folder, you will have a module with your reusable subroutine. The only
weird part: Don't forget that the last line should be just a '1'. Just
put
a use
hi all of you,
i have a multiple perl files that use the same subroutines, the only way
i know to handle this - i know its not so cleaver - is to copy paste the
portion of the subroutine in all perl files i want to use it, what is the
more clever way?
thx v. much
--
Hytham Shehab
--
To
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Please clarify. -Jimmy James
Hytham Shehab wrote:
hi all of you,
i have a multiple perl files that use the same subroutines, the only way
i know to handle this - i know its not so cleaver - is to copy paste the
portion of the subroutine
If I understand what you are asking, this is how I handle it:
For each program I write I have a directory structure like this:
index.cgi
library/ -- which is a subdirectory and contains code modules that get called
by index.cgi in the root directory of the program.
So, within my index.cgi
i think that writing a module is not my answere, i think it is a huge
complicated answere for a simple question.
all what i want is simply put all my used subroutines in a seperate files,
then call the subroutine from that file whenever i want to use the
subroutine, am i clear now?
no redundency
start the file with:
package utils;#or whatever name you want
put your subroutines in the file:
sub foo() # for instance
{
}
end the file with:
1; # package should return true
then in other files, to access:
use utils; # at top of file
and:
foo(); # to
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 03:47 , Hytham Shehab wrote:
i think that writing a module is not my answere, i think it is a huge
complicated answere for a simple question.
actually in the long run it will simplify the process.
all what i want is simply put all my used subroutines in a
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 03:47 , Hytham Shehab wrote:
[..]
Hytham - as I like to warn folks,
Oh sure, that's what you say today...
we all start at some place... and the simple library
trick is probably where we all start... Remember that
you have to in essence 'fully qualify' the
Subject: Re: how to include a subroutine from external file?
i think that writing a module is not my answere, i think it is a huge
complicated answere for a simple question.
all what i want is simply put all my used subroutines in a seperate
files,
then call the subroutine from that file whenever i
11 matches
Mail list logo
