Poonam Pahil am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2005 12.32:
> Thanks for replying John.
>
> iam having a very limited choice in modifying the design.
hello Poonam
Sorry, I meant the design of processes/subprocesses which would be bad if one
could modify the parent's environment.
> let me explain.
> I w
yup thats quite possible.
Though I wanted to do all from a single perl script.But, its also not so bad
to create another wrapper which will be using the script.
Thanks
Poonam
On 12/21/05, Xavier Noria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2005, at 12:32, Poonam Pahil wrote:
>
> > Thanks for r
On Dec 21, 2005, at 12:32, Poonam Pahil wrote:
Thanks for replying John.
iam having a very limited choice in modifying the design.let me
explain.
I want to write a perl script to automate the build process.
The normal manner is -
modify a file.
set up the build env.(use a *.cmd file)
start t
Thanks for replying John.
iam having a very limited choice in modifying the design.let me explain.
I want to write a perl script to automate the build process.
The normal manner is -
modify a file.
set up the build env.(use a *.cmd file)
start the build.
I don't want to perform all this manually
Poonam Pahil am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2005 10.34:
> Iam using the system command to call an application(windows) that sets up
> the enviorment. as per my knowledge, a subshell would be created & hence
> the modified enviorment would be lost once system returns to the parent
> perl script.
>
> How
Iam using the system command to call an application(windows) that sets up
the enviorment. as per my knowledge, a subshell would be created & hence
the modified enviorment would be lost once system returns to the parent perl
script.
How can i modify the parent process enviornment in perl using syst
