freinds,
what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
ty.
On 02/12/2013 11:01 AM, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
freinds,
what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
ty.
Don't.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
Simple, step by step directions:
1. Obtain large gun.
2. Load with ammunition.
3. Fire squarely into foot.
4. Reload if necessary and repeat.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-02-12, at 12:01 PM, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> freinds,
>
> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? pl
sorry, idea is dropped.
From: Rajeev Prasad
To: perl list
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:01 AM
Subject: obfuscating code
freinds,
what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
ty.
Perl is self-obfuscating.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 12, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> freinds,
>
> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>
> ty.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-ma
If you have to ask, you're not good enough to obfuscate or maintain your
obfuscated code.
On 2/12/13 11:01 AM, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
freinds,
what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
ty.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For addit
On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> freinds,
>
> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>
> ty.
I like the advice given in the Perl FAQ "How can I hide the source for my Perl
program?", which says:
"Delete it.&qu
It's Perl. The obfuscation is built in.
On Feb 12, 2013 7:05 PM, "Rajeev Prasad" wrote:
> freinds,
>
> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>
> ty.
That goes in my list of "best answers ever" ;)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Nitay Artenstein wrote:
> It's Perl. The obfuscation is built in.
> On Feb 12, 2013 7:05 PM, "Rajeev Prasad" wrote:
>
>> freinds,
>>
>> what is the advice just
>> On Feb 12, 2013 7:05 PM, "Rajeev Prasad" wrote:
>>> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
I think you're getting the idea, at this point, that this is
considered a bad idea, regardless of what platform you're targeting.
You m
de, in hex, and most don't bother.
Two very different things.
From: Rajeev Prasad
To: perl list
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:01 AM
Subject: obfuscating code
freinds,
what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
ty.
On 12 Feb 2013 18:56, "John SJ Anderson" wrote:
>
> >> On Feb 12, 2013 7:05 PM, "Rajeev Prasad" wrote:
> >>> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>
> I think you're getting the idea, at this point, that this
, timothy adigun <2teezp...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2013 18:56, "John SJ Anderson" wrote:
> >
> > >> On Feb 12, 2013 7:05 PM, "Rajeev Prasad" wrote:
> > >>> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
> &
3 1:30 PM
> To: timothy adigun
> Cc: John SJ Anderson; Perl Beginners
> Subject: Re: obfuscating code
>
> I see everyone is eager to judge this as a terrible idea, its the exact
> same response Ive gotten to this question on mailing lists on IRC.
>
> HOWEVER, I think this can
I understand that obfuscating code is not a real detriment to a seriously
motivated knowledgeable hacker. Yet I still think some security is
preferable to no security at all. Also I wish this problem could be
attacked somehow other than suggesting to switch to a different language.
On Tue, Feb
simply delete the
code.
All other solutions will simply frustrate those with good intentions and
just make it more interesting for those with bad intentions.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:39 PM, jbiskofski wrote:
> I understand that obfuscating code is not a real detriment to a seriously
> mo
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:39 AM, jbiskofski wrote:
> I understand that obfuscating code is not a real detriment to a seriously
> motivated knowledgeable hacker. Yet I still think some security is
> preferable to no security at all. Also I wish this problem could be
> attacked someho
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:15:18PM +0100, Rob Coops wrote:
> The problem with obfuscation is that if does not work.
Perhaps a good real world example is video game copyright
infringement ("piracy"). Several publishers spend big money
having the developers implement various "DRM" and obfuscation
sc
On Feb 12, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
I played with "Acme::Bleach"
http://search.cpan.org/~dconway/Acme-Bleach-1.150/lib/Acme/Bleach.pm
It takes a different approach to obfuscating code, but it
b 12, 2013 at 11:54 AM, John SJ Anderson
wrote:
>>> On Feb 12, 2013 7:05 PM, "Rajeev Prasad" wrote:
>>>> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>
> I think you're getting the idea, at this point, that this is
> considered
On 2/12/13 12:54 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote:
Also, I'm a little disappointed in the "it's Perl, it's already
obfuscated" answers. If you think the Perl you're writing is
pre-obfuscated, you're doing it wrong. My Perl code is idiomatic, easy
to read and understand, and as clear, if not more so, th
On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:50 PM, David Crouse wrote:
> Seriously, I took it as just funny... get off your soapbox.
> I'm fairly sure that the comment was just in good fun.
I'm happy you were amused. I wasn't, and I imagine anybody that's had to deal
with the "Perl is a write-only language" percept
On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Kevin Walzer wrote:
> I'm an experienced developer in several other languages (Python, Tcl,
> AppleScript, JavaScript, C/Objective C), so I'm quite familiar with
> structuring a program--but as I work on learning Perl, I find it somewhat
> obscure, if not downrigh
On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:18 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote:
>
> There's nothing idiomatic about that. I'd write that code as:
>
> # do whatever needed to get filename out of $_ into $filename here
> open( my $INPUT , '<' , $filename ) or die( "Can't open $filename ($!)" );
> foreach my $line ( ) {
On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Jim Gibson wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:18 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote:
>
>>
>> There's nothing idiomatic about that. I'd write that code as:
>>
>> # do whatever needed to get filename out of $_ into $filename here
>> open( my $INPUT , '<' , $filename ) or die
Hi all,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> freinds,
>
> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>
> ty.
thanks all for the great responses. Here is something I have written about it
in the context of using Python bytec
From: "Shlomi Fish"
Hi all,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> freinds,
>
> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>
> ty.
thanks all for the great responses. Here is something I have written about it
in th
09:01:27 -0800 (PST)
> Rajeev Prasad wrote:
>
>> freinds,
>>
>> what is the advice just for obfuscating code? platform is solaris.
>>
>> ty.
>
> thanks all for the great responses. Here is something I have written about it
> in the context of using Python
Kevin Walzer wrote:
I'm an experienced developer in several other languages (Python, Tcl,
AppleScript, JavaScript, C/Objective C), so I'm quite familiar with
structuring a program--but as I work on learning Perl, I find it
somewhat obscure, if not downright obfuscated. None of the other
language
From: "Tiago Hori"
> I despise the argument that some places are lawless and therefore you need
> encryption and DRM. Those places you are probably thinking of
> are the one more in need of free culture. Poor third world countries.
Yep. The problem is that there are more people living in thos
> Yep. The problem is that there are more people living in those countries
> than on rich countries. Not everyone lives in USA. :-)
> And the culture cannot be changed by a few software developers that try to
> earn for living.
>
Agreed. I think in there lies the biggest limitation. My point was,
From: "Bob McConnell"
You cannot obfuscate the input to an interpreter. It has to be in a format
that the interpreter will recognize, which necessarily means that people
can
also read it. If you really need to hide your source code, you have to
switch to a compiled language with an actively o
From: "Rob Coops"
Hi Bob,
The problem with obfuscation is that if does not work. No mater how far
you
go (all database tables are called T with every column being
C) all variables being single letter things like $a and @a and %b
one that wants to will always be able to read it. The only thin
From: "John SJ Anderson"
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:39 AM, jbiskofski wrote:
I understand that obfuscating code is not a real detriment to a seriously
motivated knowledgeable hacker. Yet I still think some security is
preferable to no security at all. Also I wish this proble
<http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=180777>
bm
> -Original Message-
> From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 12:53 PM
> To: Bob McConnell; Perl Beginners
> Subject: Re: obfuscating code
>
> From: "Bob Mc
[mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 12:53 PM
> > To: Bob McConnell; Perl Beginners
> > Subject: Re: obfuscating code
> >
> > From: "Bob McConnell"
> >
> > > You cannot obfuscate the input to an interpreter. It
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:11 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:50 PM, David Crouse wrote:
>
>> Seriously, I took it as just funny... get off your soapbox.
>> I'm fairly sure that the comment was just in good fun.
>
> I'm happy you were amused. I wasn't, and I imagine anybody t
On 12/02/2013 22:50, David Crouse wrote:
Seriously, I took it as just funny... get off your soapbox.
I'm fairly sure that the comment was just in good fun.
As a systems admin, i've had to "decipher" my share of perl,
and while it "can" be written great, it "can" also be written poorly.
David,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 03:18:51PM -0800, John SJ Anderson wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Kevin Walzer wrote:
>
> > Does Perl have the equivalent of Python bytecode files, i.e. pyc,
> > that are obfuscated? If not, the OP's options may be limited.
>
> No such critter in Perl.
Whilst t
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Does Perl have the equivalent of Python bytecode files,
What about, say, Acme::Bleach
http://search.cpan.org/~dconway/Acme-Bleach-1.150/lib/Acme/Bleach.pm
"The first time you run a program under use Acme::Bleach, the module
removes all t
From: "Bob McConnell"
People have been selling both Open Source and Free Software for years. Both IBM
and RedHat are doing very well at it. But they don't always require cash or
monetary profit as their selling price. You might also want to consider this
article about the open source economic
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:11:39AM +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> I read it, but it is limited to only a kind of software
> business. Those who create text editors like UltraEdit, TextPad
> or others and sell their product are in another type of
> software business because they offer a 1-time dea
From: Paul Johnson
To: John SJ Anderson
Cc: beginners@perl.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: obfuscating code
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 03:18:51PM -0800, John SJ Anderson wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Kevin Walzer wrote:
>
> > Doe
43 matches
Mail list logo
