Hi Steve and all
THX, now the script works !
as you wrote in your second mail, this is at least a documentation bug !
best regards,
mikle
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 05:01 PM, Steve Grazzini wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:38:58PM +0200, Michael Kleis wrote:
i have a question regarding th
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:01:13AM -0400, Steve Grazzini wrote:
> Safe Signals
>
> Perl used to be fragile in that signals arriving at inopportune moments
> could corrupt Perl's internal state. Now Perl postpones handling of
> signals until it's safe (between opcodes).
>
> Th
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:38:58PM +0200, Michael Kleis wrote:
> i have a question regarding the switch from perl 5.6 to perl 5.8 and the
> usage of fork and signal handlers.
>
> I have written a script (on a debian linux (sid) box, perl 5.6.1)
> that is using fork and a signal handler (if a CHLD
Hi all,
i have a question regarding the switch from perl 5.6 to perl 5.8 and the
usage of fork and signal handlers.
I have written a script (on a debian linux (sid) box, perl 5.6.1)
that is using fork and a signal handler (if a CHLD signal received some
cleanup function is called).
After updatin
