On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 at 14:13, drieux opined:
[snip]
d: sub should { defined($REQ_PARAMS-{$_[0]}); }
d:
d: sub doDaemon {
d:
d: }
d: sub kickDaemon { $me=shift; $me-doDaemon(@_); }
d: # the synonym trick...
d:
d:Which still gives me a HASH to
Hi,
My cgi script has been written in order to collect some parameters (with the
POST method) but actually if I want to record them, I can just put them in a
pre-existent file. I am unable to create a new file, even with a 'chmod 777'
on my directory...
I would have a result like this:
Jean-Baptiste.Claude wrote:
Hi,
My cgi script has been written in order to collect some parameters
(with the POST method) but actually if I want to record them, I can
just put them in a pre-existent file. I am unable to create a new
file, even with a 'chmod 777' on my directory...
I would
On Friday, Sep 12, 2003, at 00:47 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sergey,
ah, I see, you are new to the Ungainly Art, of not
only programming, which you are doing well in, but
the more Arcane art of Daemonology. So bear with me
while I try to write some 'back and fill' here.
A part of the
Drieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This discussion goes along with the one you are having with fliptop.
One of my first question is - why the 'closure' eg:
{
package FOO;
}
Or is that simply to make 'clear' that outside of
the Closure it is still
On Friday, Sep 12, 2003, at 18:54 US/Pacific, Todd W. wrote:
[..]
I dont think you can call that a closure yet. You would have to be
defining
subroutines that refer to lexical variables outside of the subroutine
or
something along those lines:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trwww]$ perl
{
my $dog =
