XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

2005-09-21 Thread David Dorward
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:11:59PM +0200, MNibble wrote: I won't say you are wrong, since you are right.I (please don't throw stones or bits at me) already use css und div span and stuff like that and if it is called xhtml that's fine for me That isn't what is called XHTML. XHTML 1.0 is

Re: XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

2005-09-21 Thread Chris Devers
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Dorward wrote: XHTML 1.1 is XHTML 1.0 Strict with Ruby added. Really? As in the scripting language Ruby? Weird... -- Chris Devers öQKÂm݃g5¾ÿ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

2005-09-21 Thread David Dorward
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:18:37AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote: On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Dorward wrote: XHTML 1.1 is XHTML 1.0 Strict with Ruby added. Really? Yes. As in the scripting language Ruby? No. As in the Ruby Annotation language.