Re: flock and Fcntl

2003-01-09 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
See perldoc -f flock, but specifically, no you do not need the 'use' statement with the way you are calling flock, that is with the '2' instead of using one of the "symbolic" names that Fcntl:flock provides, from the aforementioned perldoc: "OPERATION is one of LOCK_SH, LOCK_EX, or LOCK_UN, pos

flock and Fcntl

2003-01-09 Thread Rene Verharen
Hi all, Do I always need use Fcntl qw(:flock); if I want to use flock(FILEHANDLE, 2) in my scripts ? I'm asking because some scripts I found on the web do and some other don't, although they all use flock. Is there also a nice way to omit the "flock() unimplemented on this platform"