From: Junyan He
Signed-off-by: Junyan He
---
backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_ocl_function.hxx | 87
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_ocl_function.hxx
b/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_ocl_function.hxx
index 9536a3c..947fadc 100644
---
LGTM, will push latter, thanks.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:37:00AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> If /dev/dri/cardX is inaccessible, return CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND,
> don't assert-fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Palmer
>
> diff --git a/src/x11/dricommon.c b/src/x11/dricommon.c
> index 03f542c..
LGTM, will push latter, thanks.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:35:56AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> As beignet now works with LLVM/Clang 3.6, accept this version
> when searching for llvm-config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Palmer
>
> diff --git a/CMake/FindLLVM.cmake b/CMake/FindLLVM.cmake
> i
LGTM, will push latter. Thanks.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:34:22AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Compile the OpenCL standard library with the same version of clang
> as will compile OpenCL user code, not plain "clang" (i.e. the
> system default version, which may be different).
>
> Signed-off
When trying to register a callback on the clEnqueueReadBuffer command, since it
is processed
synchroniously all the time, the command was marked CL_COMPLETE every time. If
the event returned
by clEnqueueReadBuffer was then used to register a callback function, the
callback function did
no check
Right, the patch embedded in previous email has format problem.
Could you use "git send-email" to send the patch again?
Thanks for your contribution.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:58:10AM +, Yang, Rong R wrote:
> The patch looks good to me. Can you send this patch individually?
> Thanks.
>
> >
The patch looks good to me. Can you send this patch individually?
Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> David Couturier
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 05:09
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet]
That's OK
On 2015年03月23日 17:09, Yang Rong wrote:
HADD is equal to (src0>>1) + (src1>>1) + ((src0&0x1) & (src1&0x1)),
and RHADD is equal to (src0>>1) + (src1>>1) + ((src0&0x1) | (src1&0x1)).
V2: Save 1 register for both, and 1 AND for I64HADD.
Signed-off-by: Yang Rong
---
backend/src/backend
HADD is equal to (src0>>1) + (src1>>1) + ((src0&0x1) & (src1&0x1)),
and RHADD is equal to (src0>>1) + (src1>>1) + ((src0&0x1) | (src1&0x1)).
V2: Save 1 register for both, and 1 AND for I64HADD.
Signed-off-by: Yang Rong
---
backend/src/backend/gen8_context.cpp | 123
From: Junyan He
Signed-off-by: Junyan He
---
backend/src/libocl/CMakeLists.txt |2 +-
backend/src/libocl/include/ocl_work_group.h | 118 +
backend/src/libocl/src/ocl_work_group.cl| 126 +++
3 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 1
OK, it's a better way to avid the usage of addc.
I think tmp_dst can also be avoided here to save
one tmp register.
On 2015年03月23日 15:44, Song, Ruiling wrote:
Good idea, the patch LGTM.
-Original Message-
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Yang R
Good idea, the patch LGTM.
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 2:26 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] BDW: Refine I64HADD and I64RHA
12 matches
Mail list logo