Please skip this patch. I have sent another patch to solve the problem.
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Song, Ruiling
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 11:03 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>
> Subject:
This version looks good!
Ruiling
-Original Message-
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Yang
Rong
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 4:18 PM
To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Yang, Rong R
Subject: [Beignet] [Patch V2
LGTM
Ruiling
-Original Message-
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Vesely
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 1:13 PM
To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] libocl: Consider only bottom ilogb(2m-1)+1 bits
Signed-off-by: Jan
LGTM
Ruiling
-Original Message-
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Vesely
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 12:17 PM
To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] libocl: Add shuffle and shuffle2 builtins for half
type
LGTM
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:33 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Runtime: fix a
LGTM
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:46 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] GBE: fix a errMsg
LGTM
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 1:40 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Runtime: fix the
I think using atexit() in a dlopen library may be unsafe.
Take a look at this.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17350308/atexit-considered-harmful
"Interaction of atexit with dlopen or other methods of loading libraries
dynamically is not defined.
A library which has registered atexit handlers
LGTM! the function pointer may be null for some platform.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:11 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
Looks good.
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [Patch V2] cmake:
Hi Yang Rong,
Please help merge this patch. These lines of code cause build error. And in
fact they are not needed.
Hi Yichao,
Sorry for this. In fact these two lines of code should be removed.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 7:08 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 1/3] Runtime: fix a recurrent
LGTM
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander.wang
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:56 PM
> To: beig...@freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH V4] backend: add
LGTM
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander.wang
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 9:50 AM
> To: beig...@freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH V2] backend: refine
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Rander
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:24 PM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beig...@freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Beignet] [PATCH V2] backend: add global immediate optimization
>
>
>
> -----O
> + else if (src0.type == GEN_TYPE_D || src0.type == GEN_TYPE_UD)
> + {
> +int s0 = src0.value.d;
> +if (src0.absolute)
> + s0 = fabs(s0);
Here I think it should be abs(s0), right?
> +if (src0.negation)
> + s0 = -s0;
Hi Adrian,
Beignet has never supported SandyBridge(SNB) since project start.
Even if you make some modification to let the source code compile successfully,
You will still fail to run any OpenCL program as the OpenCL compiler in Beignet
only target graphics processor since IvyBridge.
Thanks!
Do you mean the ECC (Error Correcting Codes) on Intel GPU by “hardware
mistakes”?
Intel GPU adds one bit ECC support to L3 Cache since Broadwell. For details,
you can look at:
https://01.org/sites/default/files/documentation/intel-gfx-prm-osrc-bdw-vol07-3d_media_gpgpu_3.pdf
I am not sure whether
> -Original Message-
> From: Rebecca N. Palmer [mailto:rebecca_pal...@zoho.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 2:50 PM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] [PATCH newRT] Add cl_gen_device_common.h
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Xiuli Pan
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:13 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pan, Xiuli
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 1/2] Backend: Store the spill
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Rebecca N. Palmer
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 2:37 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] [PATCH newRT] Add cl_gen_device_common.h file.
>
> +#ifdef
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 5:40 PM
> To: beig...@freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] backend: add double support to fmax
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Rander
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 1:12 PM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beig...@freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Beignet] [PATCH] utests: add utest to double version of log,
> log2,
> log10
>
> A
> +static void builtin_double_logx(void)
> +{
> + // Setup kernel and buffers
> + int k, i, index_cur;
> + unsigned long gpu_data[max_function * count_input] = {0};
> + float diff;
> + char log[256] = {0};
> +
> + OCL_CREATE_KERNEL("builtin_double_logx");
> +
I just thought of a problem.
> -#if LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR == 3 && LLVM_VERSION_MINOR >= 9
> +#if LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR * 10 + LLVM_VERSION_MINOR >= 39
I think it is better to add "LLVM_VERSION" in llvm_includes.hpp:
#define LLVM_VERSION (LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR * 10 + LLVM_VERSION_MINOR)
So at each place we only check LLVM_VERSION
I am Ok with this.
Ruiling
___
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
may not be applied to other platform.
How much will the patch affect the compile time?
From: yan.wang [mailto:yan.w...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 10:52 AM
To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beignet
<beignet@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [Beigne
LGTM
- Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 9:56 AM
> To: beig...@freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 5/5] Backend: add double
LGTM
- Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander
> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 5:48 PM
> To: beig...@freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 4/4] Backend:add double
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> yan.w...@linux.intel.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 5:41 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yan Wang
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH v2] Provide more
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander
> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 10:20 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 2/2] Backend: refine the geometry
LGTM
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 10:25 AM
> To: beig...@freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 7/7] Backend: for BDW and
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 12:25 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Backend: for BDW and after,
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> rander
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 10:42 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Rander
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Backend: for BDW and after,
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> xionghu@intel.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 6:59 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Luo, Xionghu
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] add selection
The patchset LGTM. Thanks for you hard work to make the code more clean!
- Ruiling
___
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
The patchset LGTM
Ruiling
___
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
Basically looks good, But some typos.
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 5:34 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet]
Looks good, only some grammar suggestions.
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 5:41 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject:
LG
- Ruiling
___
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 10:59 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] GBE: fix two mix pointer bug.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 6:32 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [Patch V2] GBE: correct the
LGTM
- Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 6:03 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Meng Mengmeng ; Yang, Rong R
>
Looks good.
- Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 5:00 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Add the
The patchset LGTM
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 5:16 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 2/2] utest:
Looks good. Thanks for the fix.
- Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> yan.w...@linux.intel.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 4:28 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yan Wang
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 4:47 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] GBE: fix a src/dst register
The first 10 patches in the patchset LGTM.
As the last 9 patches are related to device_enqueue. I am not sure Xiuli would
have any comments?
Thanks!
Ruiling
___
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
The patchset LGTM.
___
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
> -Original Message-
> From: Guo, Yejun
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 10:55 AM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Beignet] [PATCH 2/4] support sends (split send) for untyped
> write
>
>
Looks good. Thanks for the fix.
- Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> yan.w...@linux.intel.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 2:55 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yan Wang
> -Original Message-
> From: Guo, Yejun
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 10:21 AM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Beignet] [PATCH 1/4] prepare gen9 sends binary format and enable
> the ASM dump for se
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Guo, Yejun
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:43 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Guo, Yejun
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 2/4] support sends (split send)
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Guo, Yejun
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:42 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Guo, Yejun
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 1/4] prepare gen9 sends binary
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Chris Wilson
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 9:35 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] intel: Check that we
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Xiuli Pan
> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 3:17 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pan, Xiuli
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH V3 3/3] Backend: Add hole reuse in
-Original Message-
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Yang
Rong
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 4:03 PM
To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Yang, Rong R
Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] GBE: Fix assert when get metadata
Hi Rong,
The patchset is good, I think we can merge it.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Xiuli Pan
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 1:11 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pan, Xiuli
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Xiuli Pan
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 1:41 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Li, Peng ; Pan, Xiuli
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH]
It's ok for me.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang, Rong R
> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 4:00 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] [PATCH] Runtime: Add assert of
LGTM
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 2:48 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 1/2]
LGTM
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 12:45 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Runtime:
Hi Grigore,
After applying the patchset. Looks like some utest failed.
These failure relate to gamma functions.
Ocl spec requires tgamma() should be < 16ulp.
Although ocl spec does not give out ulp for lgamma and lgamma_r.
I think if we can make it under 16ulp. That is acceptable.
Please help to
Ping for review
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Ruiling Song
> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 3:18 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>
> Subject: [B
> -Original Message-
> From: Song, Ruiling
> Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 3:58 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] GBE: Handle null and uninitialized pointer when do
> pointer/bti analysi
This one plus the previous version three patches looks good. This is big
performance improvement to the math functions.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Grigore Lupescu
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:38
LGTM. The condition check should be in the new order.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:41 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
LGTM
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 4:20 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org;
> arun.siluv...@linux.intel.com
> Subject:
I am ok with this patch.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:29 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet]
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:17 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Runtime: Use uanme to get kernel
The patchset LGTM
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 4:14 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet]
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:15 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 2/2] Runtime: fix caffe
>};
> -
> +#define GEN_BINARY_VERSION 1
>static const unsigned char
> gen_binary_header[GBHI_MAX][GEN_BINARY_HEADER_LENGTH]= \
> - {{0, 'G','E', 'N', 'C', 'B',
> 'Y', 'T'},
> - {0, 'G','E', 'N', 'C',
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Eiler [mailto:eiler.m...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:36 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Building unit tests on Fedora 24
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to compile beignet on Fedora 24 and noticed that some unit
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Rebecca N. Palmer
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 5:40 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Beignet] Pointer load/store - obsolete documentation?
>
> The documentation says "an
The first four patches look good. But personally I don't think the 5th patch is
proper for merge, although I am not good at copyright topics.
Thanks!
Ruiling
___
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> diff --git a/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_backend.cpp
> b/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_backend.cpp
> index 1c41207..033e7de 100644
> --- a/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_backend.cpp
> +++ b/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_backend.cpp
> @@ -1474,9 +1474,6 @@ namespace gbe
>return;
> }
> if
> -Original Message-
> From: Lupescu, Grigore
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 3:06 PM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Beignet] [PATCH 1/3] Benchmark: Evaluate math performance on
> intervals
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Grigore Lupescu
> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 3:04 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 1/3] Benchmark: Evaluate math performance on
> intervals
>
> From:
I have fix them and send v2. Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo, Xionghu
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3:18 PM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>; beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>
> Subject:
Hi Xiuli,
I have made such modification in my local machine. I have just send it out to
the mail list.
I think we need to make a small wrapper for
interp_program_get_global_constant_size(program->opaque);
And I also add a minor check against is_built to make sure the program was
built
It's OK for me.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Xiuli Pan
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 3:58 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pan, Xiuli
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH OCL20
an
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:33 PM
> To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com>
> Cc: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] [PATCH 3/7] GBE: add ocl 2.0 work_group_barrier
> support.
>
> Hi Ruiling,
>
> The patch set LGTM, only a small probl
Please help review this version, I just rebased to latest ocl2.0 branch.
You can skip previous version of these patches.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Song, Ruiling
> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 2:53 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Song, Rui
Beignet previously support a mesa version. But as mesa changes, things may not
work correct now.
So we disable the mesa extension in below commit.
commit 47ebe2e96c777d9fd2ba07cef0e681eaff243fa1
Author: Zhigang Gong
Date: Fri Dec 5 10:19:21 2014 +0800
CL: Don't
Hi Xiuli,
The patch is OK for me. I would like this to be merged into OCL20 branch first.
Have you done some test against master branch? I just want to make sure it does
not break anything in OpenCL 1.2.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet
LGTM
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Xiuli Pan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:38 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pan, Xiuli
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Libocl:
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> xionghu@intel.com
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:42 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Luo, Xionghu
> Subject: [Beignet] [Patch v2 2/2] [OCL20]
This patchset LGTM.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> xionghu@intel.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 7:35 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Luo, Xionghu
> Subject:
Please remove the .swp files, the patch itself looks good to me.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 4:14 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> xionghu@intel.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:17 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Luo, Xionghu
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH v2 2/9] [OCL20]
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Daniel M Gessel
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:59 PM
> Cc: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] Introductory questions
>
> Thank you so much for your answers.
>
>
The patchset LGTM.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Guo Yejun
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:15 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Guo, Yejun
> Subject: [Beignet]
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Daniel M Gessel
> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 8:13 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Beignet] Introductory questions
>
> Is this a good list to ask introductory
LGTM
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Zhigang Gong
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:08 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Gong, Zhigang
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH]
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Yang Rong
> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 2:42 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Rong R
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] GBE: remove stacksize 64KB
LGTM, thanks for adding 3.8 support.
Thanks!
Ruiling
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Pan Xiuli
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:15 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pan, Xiuli
>
Hi Anastasia,
Do you have any comment/suggestion on this?
Thanks!
Ruiling
From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Luo, Xionghu
via cfe-dev
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:03 PM
To: 'cfe-...@lists.llvm.org'
Cc: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
Yes, it is supported. You can have a try.
Please take a look at Beignet Wiki page:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/
If you still have problem, you can send email to this mail list.
Thanks!
Ruiling
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Andrés
Yes, I agree with you. But at least as I know haswell hardware does not support
double well.
Hi Junyan,
Can we handle it graciously? Do you have any idea?
Thanks!
Ruiling
From: Paulo Dias [mailto:paulo.miguel.d...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 8:37 PM
To: Song, Ruiling
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo